Pix achieves literally a thousand times that.
310 karma · joined April 26, 2022
Pix achieves literally a thousand times that.
Society fucked up, and that fuck up is gonna affect a lot of people who are not able to move out. Some sort of bailout will be needed.
The burden of ALL taxes falls on both sides of the transaction. The proportion of the burden varies with market conditions, the most important being elasticity.
That's why studies like the OP are necessary, to determine how much the proportions are. Honestly I am not surprised with the result, tariffs are objectively bad. Curbing trade is bad by default.
Also, and a bit harder to overlook... Visa/MC are able to work thousands of transactions per second in the US alone. Bitcoin can do like 7. Not seven thousand, just seven. Worldwide.
It's not even a competition, really. BTC has no future without some radical changes.
I do disagree with your other points. Paper confirmation is not necessarily the only way to audit, and may in fact introduce risks of voter reidentification and coercion (voto de cabresto). The other way of auditing the machines is the parallel voting procedure, which already takes place at every election and is honestly a brilliant piece of security engineering.
For those not aware, the parallel voting procedure works as follows:
1) the day before the election (when the software has already been loaded and locked into the machines for several days), a random sample of machines is selected for the procedure
2) those machines are then removed from the polling place they would ordinarily be assigned to, and replaced with a backup machine
3) the removed machine is then installed in a different room, and booted up normally on electionday. Since it is fully offline, the machine doesn't "know" it is being used in this mode
4) this room is setup so that there are cameras pointed to the machine, and people from all observing parties (and common citizens as well) are invited to "mock vote" in this room.
5) at the end of the day, the machine is closes, its report printed, and the result is checked against the known mock votes
Pretty solid method if you ask me, and much cheaper than upgrading the entire fleet to enable printing.
That leaves a huge internal paper trail - the kind of thing that shows up during discovery in a lawsuit.
No, companies like that are not doing this kind of shit, it's not worth it.
Also, evidence doesn't have to be externally visible. In a lawsuit discovery will dig through design docs, server logs, emails, chats, everything.
> there's some people at Google using Edge
I'd be surprised if it's more than a handful of people with explicit exceptions for work-related tasks. Chrome is the norm.
In other words: if it's Joe Schmoe's Haberdashery forwarding CCTV footage to police to elucidate a crime right in front of their door, sure, it's fine and dandy, they do have an interest in not having crime in front of their door. But when Revolving Door MegaCorp builds a dragnet of surveillance AND is also selling cloud contracts to the government by the billion, it becomes a lot more murky if they just start snitching on everything they see.
Bringing that bridge down is also much harder than blowing up the pipeline, because the bridge is covered by a lot of defenses, and naval drones will always have limited payload (if they want to be fast enough to evade defenses). Dudes performing a dive in the middle of the sea far from the battlefield are much less vulnerable.
It costs the Brazilian government around $10M yearly to maintain[1]. A bargain.
[1] https://www.infomoney.com.br/economia/custo-para-manter-pix-...