foolswisdom

No, it's about a party's right to demand a jury trial.

You don't ever eat salads that have avocado in them?

It refers to a document (or documents?) making the case why someone (themselves) should be promoted.

Thanks.

> we’re talking a mere 19 to 30 nanoseconds to get the time elapsed since a reference date and compare it to a threshold.

The table shows 19 or 30 milliseconds for Date / NSDate. Or am I misunderstanding something?

By that logic, price fixing is okay, because you yourself don't have the power to price fix, you need to coordinate with others to do so!

The fact that they spend money in order to abuse market power, rather than already having all of that market power (without paying another party) and misusing it shouldn't be relevant.

I understand why it would increase the cost versus when interest rates are low, but I don't see why high interest rates should cause continuing inflation?

> For example, the justification for nuking Nagasaki was "well, there's a factory nearby, so that's a valid military target".

Erm, what? The justification for nuking nagasaki was that demonstrating overwhelming might would swiftly end the war (it did) while continuing conventional war would cause many more casualties over time.

Maybe you mean to say that because a lot of ships, bombs and military equipment were made there (though it wasn't merely "a factory nearby") they dropped the bomb there rather than somewhere else.

Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_a...

Future cash flows is usually pretty strongly related to the current state of things, but adjusted based on expectations of how it will play out in the future.

I don't know about the FDNY in particular, but lots of agencies beyond FBI / police have jurisdiction to arrest people.

To be clear, that would mean that all stocks would be perfectly priced based on available information. But available information presumably includes uncertainties, and some companies will do better or worse than expected. It would mean that there'd be no gain in purchasing one company over another, or that there's no "cheap deals", but it wouldn't mean that money in the market wouldn't grow, nor change the fact that the S&P is likely your best option.

It might be that's all you meant by the above, in which this is merely an elaboration.

> That said I find my effectiveness at decision making deteriorates, so it would only be good for tasks where the right path is obvious. For important complex decisions I think I am still better off well rested.

My experience is the same. Sadly it's not just specific decision making, but all the important parts of my life depend on me having good executive function or they might happen even if I know the way forward.

I think the point was about the wasting, not the loan (for which the GP helpfully provided a link).

Antitrust has almost never been applied to big tech, in part because antitrust enforcement in general is only given lip service for many decades. This environment means it's also very difficult for antitrust enforcers to win even if they wanted to. This has been changing recently though. https://www.thebignewsletter.com is a great resource on these things.

This seems to be like state machines, aside from

> As new ideas and requirements are discovered, we can forbid certain things from happening by simply adding new b-threads; without having to dig and figure out how earlier-written code works!

Which I'm not really sure is a step up from state machines?

Because there is nothing to make assumptions about. In the example code, both multiplication and division have a scalar on one side, there's no possible ambiguity of behavior. But there is the eternal question of terminology: do you specify dimensions by "axis" or "dim" and does your API actually use both terms in different places?

(that's what I think the GP meant, anyway).

B# == C.

I assume B# was intentional in that comment.

No "so what". I read the comment as purely informational.

It matters though because they didn't change their designation before acting differently, which would make them liable. Not sure to whom they'd be liable though, other than the IRS.

What if I almost never remember having dreamt once I woke up (and thus can't keep a journal), is it there any mechanism to make remembering dreams more likely?

What? 13*28=364 So, missing ~1.25 days every year (instead of ~0.25 days each year with a 365 day calendar). How does this solve leap years?

Is it not "a" business model, or not Boeing's business model? The latter is exactly what the FAA is saying :-).

Yes, because the merchants raise prices because people pay with credit cards (which take fees), you take back a little (though of course not all) of extra markup via points, assuming you use a 2% cashback card (at least) on your purchase (which assuredly many people don't).

What a wonderful license! https://github.com/Speykious/cve-rs/blob/main/LICENSE

The space where tabs go (when horizontal) isn't removed in vertical tabs mode. So using vertical tabs doesn't save any extra on vertical space, only uses additional horizontal space.

Currently, if a repo is on github, and you develop a patch on a fork on gitlab, you can't just click a button to open a pr, the way you could of both upstream and fork were using the same provider. Federated PRs would be the capability for one provider to "talk" to another to be able to pull your patch from the other provider.

I know edge at least supports vertical tabs? I don't like them though (I don't have enough horizontal screen space, plus it doesn't free up the top bar space). If I start to have many open tabs I start cutting them down anyway.

I wonder the same, I can definitely see the karma of users who have only double digit (and I think I have seen single digit) karma.

Not really, he's saying that the solution is to not have the entire process in a single model, it's better to have the model work on specific pieces that you broke down, rather than feeding the whole thing and expecting the model to be able to break it down and generate correctly by itself.

I really like this idea.