3,433 karma · joined September 27, 2010
Russia is after all a rational actor on the world stage, and they must have thought the benefits are stronger than the cons.
I actually think that this is wrong. And that is the key to understand Russia’s behavior.
Russia seems to have (legitimate I would say, given the past) fears that it will be attacked eventually like it happened in the past and needs to be - as a result of that - heavily defended.
We will always consume more energy (and food!) as our civilization progresses, I am embracing that without blocking that. Also, even without crypto we still need to find better energy sources anyways, so what's the pushback all about? We are just kicking the can down the road with no action other than "criminalizing" crypto.
I am so annoyed by this argument. The question we should be asking ourselves is how electricity is being generated in the first place. Fighting crypto is the wrong fight for environmentalists: the right fight is transitioning to healthier and cleaner source of energy in a world that will inevitably consume more and more electricity as part of our organic progress, with or without crypto.
If anything, use crypto and electric cars as a driver to enact these changes, not as blockers, since they drive more electric consumption and therefore they help making a stronger case for cleaner source of energy.
ADHD, dropping out, etc are all beliefs that society labels as “non-productive”, but when somebody has passion and determination and a lot of time doing what they enjoy doing with no reward other than feeding this passion, then that’s all it takes. Consider yourself lucky because in my experience a very small number of people can do this, nobody wants to put the time it takes. Sometimes it takes decades. Coincidentally my form of ADHD disappears once I am in the flow, makes me wonder if ADHD is just aka for “I just don’t fundamentally enjoy what I am doing therefore my brain needs to reward itself in other ways”.
Even better if we end up pursuing a nice hobby in a booming field like technology.
Reality is that most people give up, because ultimately they pursue fields they are not deeply interested in to begin with. The ultimate curse: to dedicate our life to something we don’t care because we didn’t spend enough time exploring what we really cared about.
Ultimately, if the goal of an artist is to feel great in the eyes of others, is it the sudden lack of purpose? Shouldn't an artist that believes in their own art, be happy in the good and bad times, since their artistic output is all they need to find purpose?
> Only one case out of the 150 we reviewed involved a man who suspected an ex-girlfriend of tracking him with an AirTag.
I wonder if the sample size is too small, or if it’s really a 1:150 ratio in offenses.
As such, in the US, farmer markets always feel like a scam to me.
And you are factually wrong: UberCab was created without Travis Kalanick, by Garrett Camp. Travis invested in UberCab 6 months later or so, and he became CEO as part of the deal.
Do your research please.
They got sued for using the word "cab" in "UberCab", and just shorted the name to "Uber".
Or maybe use a polyethylene layer?
By looking at a map, this is quite evident.
It's a creativity killer and that's why creative people rarely are a good fit, most times their creativity is not encouraged, but it's being dismissed as "rebellious". How is this healthy for the kids? And how uniforming them is good for society?
Sometimes I feel like school is more about power and control rather than really helping the students.
Then fast forward a few years, you end up in a situation like in San Francisco, where crime is clearly up to the roof everywhere you look, but you have local politicians saying - with confidence - that it is down instead.
So if you need need this capability for free, check it out. Not only that, but SRV record resolutions too.
So here you have a bunch of people that seem to be getting rich "at the expense" of others, and maybe don't fully understand why, therefore they put up a fight. Very natural tribal behavior identifiable in a variety of different ways in the history of human kind.
Also people think of themselves as naturally intelligent (ego), so if something is creating wealth but they don't fully understand why, the instinctive reaction is to dismiss it because the other option is to essentially admit lack of knowledge which hurts their ego, therefore it is again a natural "self preservation" reaction. Also this more naturally creates an emotional response, since ego is a highly emotional subject to begin with.
To be against Bitcoin is also a generally safer bet: dismissive opinions are almost always small easy wins in the unpredictability of the future of Bitcoin. But Bitcoin maximalist only have to be right once eventually. We saw this with every major invention, electricity (will kill people!), internet (just a fad!), etc.
Now with that said I am not expressing an opinion on the eventual success of Bitcoin, it could very well fail.
It abstracts Envoy concepts into "policies" that are easier to apply and use, it provides a more stable API and experience across distributed workloads, and it also includes native support for VM applications. Even Kelsey Hightower loves it [1].
[1] https://twitter.com/kelseyhightower/status/12805398215642439...