https://kfor.com/news/local/wife-accomplice-screenshot-857-c...
630 karma · joined May 25, 2016
https://kfor.com/news/local/wife-accomplice-screenshot-857-c...
I think the more interesting question, though, is why it bypassed the moderate safe search setting.
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/multiple-people-shot-i...
https://www.theregister.com/2019/11/07/ubiquiti_networks_pho...
They make several good points about policy moving forward and vaccinating children, but they were disregarding Omicron before we even knew much about it. Their general position aged like milk, now that there are more people in the hospital with Covid than at any point in the pandemic. They complain about Fauci holding rigid positions, while my science-illiterate family complain that the rules keep changing/are confusing. None of this addresses the fact that masks and vaccines are consistent with past policy in America and have been more effective than nothing, at least as far as people complied, or that comparisons to the flu are a bit of a stretch.
And though I really hope it's the case, I've heard no news yet that Omicron will be the last significant variant.
Approximate Populations, per wikipedia, for reference:
London: 9 million
Beijing: 21 million
NYC: 9 million
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-the-top-surveillance...Holy crap, the US has more cameras per capita than China, according to this. The UK is a somewhat distant third.
Though I think a distinction should be drawn between government-operated and commercial surveillance.
Most of us also probably live in countries where a significant fraction of the population would choose Playstation/Netflix/heroin instead. That's their choice, but you're probably right that much of it is learned behavior. Perhaps some significant resources (government funded or volunteered) should be applied toward teaching people how to make better use of their free time, if that's what they want.
It's certainly a better vision than making widgets 40 hours a week for a company with dubious social impact.
If a healthy under-40 individual had the same or slightly higher risk of dying from the vaccine as from covid, but a lower risk of passing it to their parents and any elderly person they come into contact with, should they prioritize their own small statistical advantage over the lives of those others? Should they also consider infections down the line, generated by the individuals they infected?
If someone were to present a convincing case that such a hypothetical were true, I might be forced to rethink some things. However, since the vaccine isn't mandatory, I don't see much in the way of actionable conclusions (other than posting the stats to the CDC website). Personally, I'd take on at least double the (low) risk to try and protect my family. But I'm also biased by knowing how shitty COVID can be, and preferring a quick death to a COVID death.
VAERS (an early warning system that allows unverified reports and requires physicians to report all seemingly related deaths) shows 0.0022% (9,810) of vaccinated individuals in the US died after receiving the vaccine.
Generously assuming all those reports can be directly linked to the vaccination (they can't), that figure is already three orders of magnitude lower than the 1.6% (772,000) of people who caught COVID that died. Looking at the linked charts, if we'd had the vaccine at the beginning, we could surmise that roughly 77,000 (87,000 if you want to add the unconfirmed vaccine deaths) of COVID deaths would have been vaccinated, and almost 700,000 would have been unvaccinated. Add in the potential effect of herd immunity, which we never achieved--who knows how well off we'd be if people hadn't wasted so much energy railing against the public good (for an idea, maybe look at how the polio vaccine went over with the public, and how many people in the US now have polio).
Every death is a tragedy. A little bit of elementary school knowledge of how vaccines work, combined with actually using your brain, indicates the degree of tragedy could be reduced at least 10-fold if all the irrationally angry people would just get vaccinated.
https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/nsa-awards-secret...
This is lucrative for Amazon, and likely convenient for the Five Eyes and their data sharing ambitions.
I also never said he had access to everything. Nobody has access to everything. Not arguing for a shadow government--it's already a fact. It happened when classification rules went from "what would harm national security" to "what would cause problems if American citizens found out we were doing this."
That's in the post (and, incidentally, it appears OP works for Microsoft)