3,233 karma · joined February 1, 2013
"Gender discrimination in hiring: An experimental reexamination of the Swedish case"
That's why it's a suggestion and not a feature that blocks you from writing whatever you please. It's like how I can type my last name into documents on computers I have never used before: the spellcheck indicator will show up and I will choose to just ignore it.
Like much in life, half the battle is just showing up.
I'm no so sure about that. Since leaving social media, I've become quite involved in local politics. I now know some state legislators on a first-name basis and multiple directors of state departments in multiple states. I can call up people I've helped get elected and get my thoughts right to them. I find my opinion to effect much more change than it did when I was shouting into the digital void.
Edit: sorry, I mixed up public company and public good. Twitter is a public company, but not a public good.
Another way to put this is that in the vast majority of metro areas, young women DO NOT earn more than young men. Even when you look at the areas where young women do outearn young men, it is not by a lot. For example, in the NYC area, young women earn 102% of what young men do. To my ear, that's parity.
At this point, there is basically nothing to see here. You will do yourself a favor by just moving along.
It adjusts the phrasing in a few places to make the meter flow more naturally. Apparently it also fixes a small error in the original proof, which, for the life of me, I cannot find.
I've used this poem to teach the halting problem to a variety of people for almost a decade and a half. Reading the one linked here just didn't sound right.
Hahaha! I swear this is exactly how I feel halfway through every monad tutorial I find.
Point being, no one sold this community on golf carts because they were electric and efficient. People loved them because they were affordable, simple, and practical.
Definitely in the top 10 best thing to ever happen to me.