The different between Turley and ChatGPT is that ChatGPT doesn't have a TV circuit where it can spread its lies unpromped on a nightly basis.
3,233 karma · joined February 1, 2013
The different between Turley and ChatGPT is that ChatGPT doesn't have a TV circuit where it can spread its lies unpromped on a nightly basis.
I think I'm going to stick to milking them and making soap. Maybe a little goat yoga.
Where's the beef?
If it becomes an effortless throwaway generated by an AI, it no longer has value. Additionally, you may be shooting yourself in the foot. If I see something in a cover letter that catches my eye, I'm going to bring it up in our call to learn more. Not to quiz you or play gotcha, but because it probably intreagues me and I want to learn more. If an AI wrote it and you don't know what you submitted to the job posting, that's not going to reflect well in a call.
I may be wrong and he may be actually referring to optimizing garbage collection on their servers, but this sounds like a callous and heartless way to refer to firing 10k people.
However, it could be that common opinions about authors are not tropes but warranted. In the first decade of my exposure to Stephen Wolfram, I was in awe of his intelligence. Mathematica is a wonderful tool and its step-by-step explanations of proofs are fantastic. I thought his approach to computational systems was mind-blowing.
Then I leaned more. I saw that much of his work was built on the backs of giants. His cellular automota are simplified versions of what Conroy worked on. Don't get me wrong, Wolfram formalized 1D automata in his own works, but it wasn't revolutionary. He didn't "discover" these features; he built upon the works of others.
My biggest critique of Wolfram is that he will come up with SOME new interpretation of a physical or computation phenomenon and claim that it is THE ONE TRUE INTEPERATION of how the world works. He feels like hubris personified.
But to simplify it, I think he is a smart person who often posts self-congratulatory things and I don't thing it's wrong to call him out when his writings are full of fluff.
Some days, I added a paragraph that spilled over onto the first line of a new page and that was that. Other days, one page became five became 20 as I hit a rhythm. It was always about giving myself that chance to hit it off for the day.
I've been making my way through all of her other works for the past few years. I've read the Xenogenesis trilogy two or three times. Her works speak to me about the human condition in ways very few authors have been able to.
Kindred is her last remaining work I know of that that I have not read. I've been purposefully saving it for last and it feels like now is the time.
That said, I didn't see a way to easily subscribe to it without first signing up for an account. I looked for an rss button or feed, but no luck. Searching for it in Podcast Addict does not return it. Is it available outside of Spotify?