fyokdrigd

so when are they going after google for providing free email and such?

internet watch foundation is about censorship. they only "protect the children" so you can't contradict them without looking like a criminal. they actually give criminals a legal defense as their content hash system is easy to prove a false positive.

also they are going after the only service which contributed to arrests. lol. you think criminals don't use facebook/Instagram/telegram/tiktok/email/googlemeet/msteams/etc just because you haven't heard about arests?!

disable JavaScript. internet becomes beautiful.

it's one click away with uBlockOrigin. disable for all and enable per domain as they deserve it.

hit a link that don't load? hit back and try another. it's not like there's no alternatives for everything.

and you never know which party you're trusting when you download those thousands of unvetted code into your build dependency

it's actually very easy to measure. the audience here is close to the 1%, so your usecase is already discarded in the grand scheme with a 2% error margin when measuring behavior for the large population.

in 1996 several online version of famous news papers were posting that exact same guide. it's not innovative or good. it's just what you will get if you put print designers to churn web design to webmasters (damn in old).

also the reason designers were posting this was because they were all looking for jobs.

> To be clear, I think that spying on Petrobras is wrong and I wish that Petrobras had a remedy for it.

sorry to break it to you, but the answer was too succumb to a full blow 60s style coup which remove the president who autored the Reuters article above.

she was ousted by the senate, the right wing vice who was there for "governability" signed rights to new oil reserves to texaco on his first week in power and then brazil got an election that was free for all (main candidate jailed on bogus claims, candidate working with steve banon leading, etc)

anecdotal. and you're either single or from a place where spouses are nothing but housewives

> unclear any commercial gardener avoids glyphosate even today

you fell for the spin dr work. roundup have tons of that, but it's not what 1) might cause cancer or 2) what is defended in their patents.

well, it might cause cancer too. but not what was always argued against roundup.

a non-exit tor node.