garfij

Everyone talks a lot about the inverted method, but I feel like you get the same controlled steep time by easing the plunger in a little and then pulling back out a little to create negative pressure inside tube.

This has been a fascinating back and forth. Thank you for taking the time to have a comprehensive discussion.

Specifically to be utterly pedantic: Go has algebraic types. It has both Product types (structs) and unbounded Sum types (interfaces). What you're looking for is bounded Sum types with extra language support such that when you use them, it checks that you've covered all cases.

Yes, that along with dealing with Last-Modified, If-Not-Modified, ETag, and other similar HTTP Headers is what is meant by HTTP Caching.

From what I can tell Varnish uses these same concepts to do what they do (caching HTTP reverse proxy).

See

* https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-1

* http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec13.html

* https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Caching_FA...

I dunno, seems like clicking on the next slide, or the edges of the current slide works just fine for navigation as far as mouse controls goes, and swiping is also working fairly well on my mobile devices, though I can't claim to have tested all possible mobile devices, so your mileage may vary.

My impression has been that the people in the LISP community would be happy to tell you about how their model has been fairly consistent over the past several decades and that a lot of the 'new advancements' we're seeing all the time have been available in LISP for that whole time. And, funnily enough, one of the most highly recommended projects in LISP is making your own!

I don't get to deal with LISP anywhere enough to substantiate these claims from actual experience, but that is the impression I have gotten from hanging around places like this.

Neat. I like that you can add your own type specific functions.

I was interested in seeing the implementation of the Parallel Map, but on a quick browser through the source, could not find it.

If you're interested in other works in the same space, I think think the the Gen library (http://clipperhouse.github.io/gen/) goes a long way towards providing type-safe, idiomatic, Go code to achieve the same effects.

I think a 402 with a typed "Link" response header field of "payment" (per http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988) would probably be the most appropriate no?

You could also argue it's the difference between "dogmatic adherence" and "strategic application". At this point G+ is already integrated into all the major components of their platform. While I agree this is a good move, I don't necessarily see it as a step down. Requiring all new products to immediately integrate could be a major speed bump in development, so I can see how if G+ is not truly needed in the product, that it makes sense to allow for not requiring it.

In what ways is testing an error code with an if statement more manual than catching an exception with a try/catch?

Sometimes I wish debugging worked on Windows, but generally speaking I've found Go makes unit testing natural enough that it's not a big deal.

Thank you.

noob. 3110674

I'm a hardcore "real book" lover, but the Paperwhite is definitely as good as they make it look. I leave it on the lowest backlight setting available and it works fantastic in all lighting situations.

I am plagued by the exact opposite of this. I hate providing step-by-step checklist/step-by-step guides that can follow multiple paths, yet am surrounded by people who are constantly asking for them so they can avoid needing to learn about how things actually work

Picking what language to use based on your database seems silly.

No, protocol-relative is the way to go.

By viewing the Google web cache of it.

It bears mentioning that the comments at the end of the article are worth the read.