285 karma · joined June 2, 2014
edit: having read the whole article now it's actually pretty even-handed, I guess mentioning Oppenheimer was just marketing?
virtual std::flexptr<Thing> get_expensive_thing();
vs: virtual bool has_expensive_thing();
virtual const Thing& get_expensive_thing();
virtual std::unique_ptr<Thing> build_expensive_thing();
It'd probably have shared_ptr semantics but you'd have to treat it as a const ref for lifetime purposes, which might make it distasteful to the std library folks.Alrighty then.
> It also means resisting any attempt by what Malcolm calls the ‘woke mind virus’ to assimilate their children into a progressive monoculture.
Bwoop bwoop bwoop right wing nut alert.
Here's the result from his original paper where he specifically says that it doesn't have to be at DC:
If you sample s.t. your folding frequencies are in an appropriate place, you can fold your desired region into the first nyquist region without needing to mix it down. This is especially desirable if you can avoid having to build an IQ mixer because they're hard to keep balanced.
The worst case doing this is that your signal spectrum is reversed in frequency, but you can correct that easily digitally.