genericid

- You oppose the direction Mac OS is heading but still like the current version, or

- You like Mac OS after modifying it to counter its Iosification but don't want to support a company that makes you jump to those hoops, or

- You actually like Mac OS but oppose Apple's tendency to restrict their user's freedom on principle.

Using a hackintosh just because you don't like Apple would be pointless, of course.

There is also a difference between people who find it difficult to explain complex technical questions in a manner that is easy to understand and thos who probs dont care cuz thei r 2 lzay 2 write and its ur problem

XY treatments should just go into the comments IMO. They are always relevant to the question (even if you know you want Y -- remember that SO is not just about giving you an answer but also about building a knowledge base), but they never even try to answer the question asked.

How would that even make a difference?

"Das Keyboard" is grammaticaly correct, but useless when you need the letters i-z.

Why would someone say something like "I love the lightning connector" if they aren't aware that they do? Please explain.

It means you don't give Apple money.

> You know that 90% of Electron apps do not have any native function calls

That does not make sense. If they made no native function calls, they could not even display a window.

> Maybe not consciously, but they absolutely do subconsciously.

This is not how talking works.

> love and appreciate

Normal people don't talk like that about connector sockets.

I'm not going to continue a discussion with someone that seems to guess instead of read what I write.

Of course it is a question of legality. It is a question of whether a CEO -- who has no democratic legitimacy -- should be allowed to decide what can be (in a manner that other people will actually read) published. And as I said, that their censorship is not perfect does not make a difference.

> and it doesn’t involve a legally protected class.

All your saying is that the CEOs' censorship is legal because it's legal.

That the CEOs' censorship does not work perfectly does not mean it does not exist.

> Since being a Nazi is not a legally protected category they’re free to not help Nazis.

What currently is legal is obviously irrelevant when the question is what should be legal.

Everyone would do that.

No. Facebook, YouTube and the like are more like newspaper vendors.

Nazis or not: CEOs, who are not legitimated by any democratic election, have no right to decide what other people publish.

It won't fly to tell its customers that they can't have it because Apple considers itself too special to simply follow standards and the law.

> Otherwise, democracy devolves into two me's and a Jeff Bezos voting on who pays for my stuff.

Democracy does not "devolve" into that, that is what democracy is.

6,999,999 to go.

> Even Top 500 players suffer 80ms RTT to the server and they're still better than the other 30 million players.

...that also suffer 80ms RTT.

But it's perfectly reasonable to expect the people tasked with evaluating voting systems to be experts on voting systems.

Everyone already has ten proprietary lightning cables? That's news to me.

Making it illegal still reduces it.

The EU generally considers 40% a dominant market share so even if there were a 50/50 split, it wouldn't matter.

Google allows basically everything on the Play Store. To not specifically restrict their competition would not be "bending over backwards" at all.

> if you try

Please refrain from baseless accusations. Thank you.

Nonsense. Monospaced fonts do not give punctuation weight equal to words. Fonts that give punctuation weight equal to words do. See for example the Input font family:

http://input.fontbureau.com/

Taxi driver?

Then you'd have to special-case maps that include the equator itself.

> compared to what the government is able to see.

That does not imply satellite maps.