Super cool! Imo kind of makes sense - think these sort of problems (communication) are general across actors and science seems to confirm some cases (between plants / funghi, cuddlefish, mamals..). Were not as unique as we think & thats freeing.
How cool! Thanks for sharing! :) yeah the fever / infection sessions as kids were intense experiences - super interesting insights in what the mind can produce - super valuable insights imo.
I had funny imagination while having fever as a kid as well. Could imagine a surface switching from being satin-smooth to edgy and rough in a perfect transition - maybe some form of texture-halucination..? anyways, the way it would "feel" to the touch is how it felt emotionally as well - super hard to describe but an interesting link to experience somehow :)
After meditating for 3 years, these states are common when dreaming - as awareness persists within dreams - doesnt equal lucidity - as no active actions performed - can recommend meditating, its art.
Feel like the sweeteners mess up my digestion. Are useful to get some protein after a workout - in everyday rather eat some almonds & less processed food..
I make my date B join my macys date with A via zoom, both works as Im on the treadmil & online shopping. Helps a lot to get some reflexions about A and myself from B, B is usually happy for the trust & impressed by my openness. Division is always virtual and hindering. Enjoy complexity (like making complexity jokes at dates, hihi)
I agree - it has no direct use to the wellbeing of humans - Id say if the indirect use (e.g. humans saving time [which itself is probably the most energy intensive thing, food, housing, entertainment], gaining knowledge has to surpass the costs in Order for the investment to make sense.
Worked for deprioritizing biodiversity efforts for the sake of mass produced animal products, because, more processing steps => higher economic yield. Money talks.
I dont get it. Every scientist & 5yo kid will prove you that things accelerate with 9.81 m/s^2 when falling, and guess this is still science? Which is a proof of cobtradiction that your point doesnt hold.
Since "state" means majority of people, id say is more of a question of what set of rules we want as society. Im also pro drug legalization but towards a different form of regulation there, minimizing harm created by drugs in total. I think writing laws from a CS perspective and with less politics could go a long way.
Smokers are also self-responsible for every cigarette lit - they should be expelled from insurance and society taking these willing actions and doing harm to the rest of people /s
Just because it doesnt add up for you doesnt mean its not valid. Also, it is an illustrative example, not general rule for everyone affected. Im sure most users that get into fiscal problems get there with way less spent than 25k.
Maybe its time to regulate not on specific actions like "gambling machines" but brain-pathways caused by products. This would also instantly regulate e.g. "legal research chemicals" used as drugs just as some usage pattern designs
But still - it unveils the "present" to just as well be an illusion of human categorical thinking, an abstract concept, not more. It is super useful to have none the less, just interesting to know its fragility.
Adhd & autism is not a disease but likely phenotypes of genetic diversity. Want to get rid of it? Its equal to eugenics and racism, getting rid of diversity.