Before clicking, I legitimately thought this was going to be some sort of urine analysis med tech startup. What is the reasoning behind this product naming? Does therapee mean something in photography?
2,378 karma · joined February 1, 2015
I had to take a moment to think about whether the suggestions are satire or serious, as it's hard to tell sometimes these days, but even after thinking about it -- whether this is satire or serious -- I still don't really see how any of the suggestions are angry. If serious, they are helpful. If satire, it's funny. No anger sensed. :)
BTC is expensive to transfer, but other options like LTC are not. It takes a small fraction of a penny (in USD value).
> Experts have said the Bay Area’s high housing costs and remote work policies, particularly for the tech industry, fueled out-migration during the pandemic, as residents sought cheaper homes and more space. Almost all California coastal cities lost population, while the more affordable Central Valley and Inland Empire saw gains.
My observation from the discussion here is that there are a lot of people here still raving about city life (especially as pandemic tapers down) and how people are moving back in, etc. I think it's suffice to say everyone has a different living preference, and remote work enabled people who otherwise didn't want to live here, to move away, which in turn also opened up some spaces for people who wanted to live here but found it too expensive, to move in. The real question is probably how the numbers work out. Are there a lot more people who wanted to move away and are doing so now? If so, home prices and rents would drop. If the opposite is true or the numbers are about even, then prices wouldn't drop or would drop less.
Understandably, back in the days (and maybe still the case now) the default behavior for web browsers on mobile were to load the same desktop site but zoomed out -- it wasn't a great experience, so devs looked for a way to avoid it.
I think it's fine to build a mobile responsive site with "width=device-width, initial-scale=1" (that gives you a default view that is built for mobile) but there is little reasons to have "user-scalable=no".
"How to stay competitive by building ecosystems of connected experiences that reward loyalty The power of localized payment methods to boost global revenue growth Whether recent crypto growth is sustainable or even warranted"
Kinda amusing how much shorter the final translation is:
"The environment that surrounds the environment? The status of international funding development Don't last"
> I think this is where insurance companies generally pop up as a solution.
Real legitimate DeFi protocols are now often supported by DeFi insurance as well. I know nothing about Axie Infinity and have no idea if this applies for them at all.
> (still thinking it's a solution waiting for a problem)
IMO, although this has been said many times the past few years, I think we're starting to get past this. In a very simplified view, DeFi protocols that do lending (e.g. loans based on collaterals), can do this fully automated, and it's because "the money is programmable" thanks to smart contracts and value stored. This type of lending took human work to do in TradFi and has overhead, in both costs and speed. I feel like this is the start of what real solutions/applications look like; it's something that wasn't possible before.
If the current trajectory is any indication, it's more likely that everyday users would mostly hold custodial accounts at organizations (e.g. Coinbase, like banks) and use stablecoins that way, which control aggregate wallets, and trackability stays within the org level (also like banks). Probably not as easy for the public to access (possible in data hacks) but just as easy for government access.
For example with navigation, I thought the phone does it the same but having experienced a Tesla I honestly vastly prefer the Tesla navigation. The bigger screen makes it much easier to glance where on the map I am. You can mount a phone anywhere and it won't be nearly as easily visible. (The GPS screens on my older cars are definitely worse than the phone though)
For climate control I agree fully that the older dials and buttons work better. The problem with temperature control is your body is human and you don't always want a constant temperature. I remember in my very old cars from the 90s and early 00s there's way less I have to adjust for temperature. There's a position on the dial that is pretty much always right to use for the entire season. Nowadays if I set it at 68 it's too cold on some days and too hot on some days, depending on what I'm wearing, how I'm feeling that day, etc. I have to adjust it up or down, and then next time I drive I have to adjust it again.
Depending on your timing and location, renting is way more of a shoot-yourself-in-the-foot decision than buying a house. I graduated from college in mid-2000s and after a few years finally saved up to buy a house in early 2010s. Plenty of my peers saw no real need to this and continued renting through the decade of 2010-2020 while seeing home prices rise to unaffordable levels. I acknowledge that I got lucky in my timing and location (bay area), but it's hard to imagine a scenario where buying doesn't make sense when you can afford to. If nothing else, a (fixed rate) mortgage at least guarantees your monthly housing payment won't increase, vs rent. The decision to rent (as in, not being forced to rent because you cannot afford to buy) seems way more footgun-ish.
On the jobs section, the way most people choose jobs is insane, not by choice but more because it really is that hard and luck-based choosing a job. Over my career, I got to the "choose a random company whose recruiter just happened to reach out" point and landed a job, twice, and these both happen to be jobs I loved and stayed for a long time. Notably, another time, I moved to a company because I had a lot of friends working there so I knew I'd enjoy the people there, it didn't work out after a year and a half for other reasons than the people. The point of this all is, it's just really difficult to know what really matters at a job and company, so it's really hard to call this a footgun decision.
In a business setting, you want your service to stay up, at the cost of spike in costs if accidents or mistakes happen.
In a personal project, you want there to be hard limit on cost, and your service to go down if spikes call for it. (I'm relatively sure that no one wants their personal projects to incur a bill of thousands of dollars by accident.)
Building a web site gives you all the "why"s. It gave you a motivation to learn different aspects of coding. Whether it's the presentation layer in HTML, or application logic in PHP and Javascript. Conditions, loops, arrays and even data structures all make sense when you have all the context of the thing you're trying to build.
For example, in the bay area, parking in SF is difficult to say the least and usually in paid garages. But go less than 30 miles to east bay (far east or south east bay, not Oakland or Berkeley), parking is much more plentiful everywhere and the expectation for parking is free.
If you live in the east bay and visit SF once in a while, you are coming from a daily life of the expectation of free parking to suddenly seeing signs for $20 a day, $50 a day, and so on. Without really consciously thinking about the economics and thinking, oh, it makes sense, because millions of people want to park in the city, it can definitely drive some emotional responses. If you live in SF and have thought about the economics and have accepted that parking is expensive, then the emotion and impatience and anxiety can be reduced/removed by the UX.
The most similar experience I had to this in recent years was using a program called wormhole for peer to peer file transfer: https://github.com/Jacalz/wormhole-gui
It was refreshing in a similar way; I download and open up the program, a friend does the same, and we can send files to each other, with a code genereated from the program. None of all this accounts stuff.
(For what it's worth, file sending has a similar issue as backup/sync that the author described -- most modern services are some centralized/cloud form, as opposed to the old days of ICQ/AIM/etc. where you could actually establish a direct connection to a friend and send files.)
Short of any real break-through in AI, I feel that a chatbot just isn't something most consumers want to use.
A few years ago I bought into the chatbot hype for a while (the Facebook Messenger API opening up for building chatbots was a major catalyst for that particular hype cycle; that was when I was into it), and explored a lot in building one and other AI services that helped build one. It was quickly apparent that for the most part it's simply an iteration of the "answer machine navigation tree" that 800 numbers already had, just in text form.
There was a widespread notion at the time that users wanted chatbots for reasons like wanting to speak in a human langauage with a company to get what they need and solve problems as well as having context from chat history. I think the industry has confused the mechanism (the chat) with the intention (speaking with a human). Consumers prefer a chat sure, that's because they don't want to waste time being on hold on a phone (anyone who has called customer service at any big org or the gov't would know); but ultimately their intention is to speak with a human that can solve problems. When problems arise that require speaking to a human, that's usually not something a bot or a program could solve.