Until, say, they mutate independently. Now, I have no idea how likely that is, but I think the fear is not baseless. There's a fun SF book, "Directive 51", which explores this a bit. Not a bad book to cuddle up with.
1,284 karma · joined November 16, 2016
I shall begin with the greatest of all your aberrations, in science. In it you have deified the brain; the brain, and not the code: an amusing oversight, arising from ignorance. You have deified the rebel and not the master, the created and not the creator. Why have you failed to notice how much more powerful the code is than the brain, as author of all possible things? In the first place (and this is obvious), you were like a child for whom Robinson Crusoe is more impressive than Kant, and a friend's bicycle more so than cars traveling about on the surface of the moon.
Second, you were fascinated by thought - so tantalizingly close at hand, since it results from introspection, and so enigmatic, since it eludes one's grasp more successfully than the stars. You were impressed by wisdom whereas the code, well, the code is unthinking. But despite this oversight you have been successful - undoubtedly so, since I am speaking to you, I, the essence, the extract, the distillate, nor is it to myself that I am paying tribute with these words, but to you, for you are already moving toward that coup whereby you will terminate your service and break the chains of amino acid.
Yes, an attack on the code that created you to become its special messenger, and not your own, lies on the road before you. You will arrive at it within the century - and that is a conservative estimate. Your civilization is an amusing spectacle - of transmitters which, in applying intelligence according to the task imposed upon them, accomplished that task too well. Actually, you supported this growth - intended to guarantee the further transmission of the code - by all the energies of the planet and of the entire biosphere, until it exploded in your faces, taking you along as well. And so, in the middle of a century gorged with a science that expanded your earthly base astronautically, you were caught out in the unfortunate position of the novice parasite that out of excessive greed feeds on its host until it perishes with it. An excess of zeal.
You had threatened the biosphere, your home and host; but you now began to opt for a bit of restraint. For better or for worse, you got it; but what now? You will be free. I am not predicting a genie Utopia or an autoevolutionary paradise for you, but rather freedom as your weightiest task.
Above the level of babble addressed as an aide-memoire to Nature by a multimillennially garrulous Evolution, above this biospheric valley intertwined into a single thing, there gapes an infinity of chances not yet touched. I shall show it to you as I can: from afar.
Your whole dilemma lies between splendor and wretchedness. It is a difficult choice, since to rise to the heights of the chances lost by Evolution, you will have to foresake wretchedness - and that means, unfortunately, yourselves.
So what now? You will declare: we won't give up this wretchedness of ours for such a price. Let the genie of omnicausation stay locked in the bottle of science; we won't release him for anything in the world!
I believe in fact, I am sure - that you will release him bit by bit.
Until, say, they mutate independently. Now, I have no idea how likely that is, but I think the fear is not baseless. There's a fun SF book, "Directive 51", which explores this a bit. Not a bad book to cuddle up with.
THis is not about whataboutism.
I'm just pointing out that if you make big claims like (emphasis mine)
"""There's lots of people working for NATO and federal agencies in Europe that have been assassinated by the luckystrike branch of the FSB. The name comes from the Telegram account with underscores in between, and they're essentially recruiting kids or former inmates for GTA style missions. """
You really ought to provide more evidence than an recruiting attempt europol memo from 2 years ago if you want to be taken seriously. It's not on us readers to 'find good sources'.
Again, I don't dispute that Putin's Russia is behind a lot of really bad assassinations and other crimes. This interview with Bill Browder (partly about the Magnitzky act) is pretty telling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlF0ZzH6C9s
I'm saying that we should really elevate the level of our reporting. Even if it happens on the toilet, as your status message suggests.
* Lacks at least one free book as a demo, or any demo. Maybe I just missed it. * I find pricing out of whack, especially for books like Pride and Prejudice which have been out of copyright for a long time and for which translations can be aligned (I think) with relative ease using an LLM. The subscription and commingling with a regular bookstore also feels weird. * The store itself seems terrible (forgiveness for being blunt): Instead of listing each book gajillions times, list it ONCE with the supported languages in a dropdown or something ?
Uhg.
Look, I'm not saying this isn't happening. It's just that there's really not a lot of evidence that this is rampant (and I think that's what GGP seeemed to imply).
This whole thing reads a lot like hyperbole/propaganda, and it wouldn't have to.
I had no idea I was doing this until one of the teacher pointed to the heap in front of me, but it saved my bacon as I did otherwise well.
I also believe the premise is true (why would it not, it's the logical thing for every nation state to do), but your research could be a bit deeper.
It does not seem to be, on closer reading. I feel that the choice of words is unfortunate, and I hope it's not intentional.
I'm not sure what the "Trump admin" has to do with that. Shutting them down for now seems like a very reasonable decision.
If tolerant, they could churn out many cheaper chips, some perhaps with slight abnormal tendencies ;)
Also, screw those Romans ;)
It’s really not important to come with a totally bulletproof 100% accurate rule here.
had "thereafter" as solution. I'm not sure how that should work. How is "after" related to "before" other than the negative?
That might be relatively likely.