9,503 karma · joined January 27, 2017
* Replicating speech, Archiving speech, and separating the acts of speaking and listening from each other. There are alternatives to written format.
* Speech that can be edited easily, until it is perfected.
* Speech that be sped up, slowed down, and jumped around with random access and search.
* Silent speech.
These features can be achieved with alternative technologies.
Written communication also has drawbacks. It is a lossy compression of spoken speech.
Philosophy is a broad, vague category.
So the blog post contradicts the entire premise of the site.
This is just an ad for their valuation service.
"non-fiction" doesn't mean "correct".
arXiv users are the peers doing the review.
"Peer review" has existed for centuries before journals created their own bad for-profit version.
Perhaps the shoplifters are less iportant to the surveillance state than the people protesting government abuse and getting chased around the country to their workplaces and vacation hotels?
Some of Euclid's proofs are wrong, because they relied on those non-rigorous picture definitions.
* Book I, Proposition 1 (constructing an equilateral triangle)
* Book I, Proposition 4 (Side-Angle-Side triangle congruence).
* Multiple theorems throughout the Elements rely on the visual "betweenness" of points.
Please give an example of an interaction with an animal that suggests that the animal is conscious, but not using language.
Challenge round: Please demonstrate that conscious animals are not using internal idiolect (language with 1 user) and lack the physical ability to develop a form of shared communication for that language.
He also copied Friendster.
> But in the current dev tools gold rush, if something sounds too good to be true, it almost always is.
The people who are interested in RTK and in criticism of RTK aren't interested in pablum like this.