gp7

If anyone is interested in some thoughts on this question that have been in vogue in recent years in academic philosophy circles you might want to look into speculative realism (and also look into the immediate disavowel of the term the moment those involved felt pigeon-holed).

This sounds like a good idea; I won't be using it

> Stroustrup: Without supporting libraries, most serous applications are unnecessarily hard in C++.

Indeed.

Literary Theory: An Introduction, Terry Eagleton

Ah, the click bait of yesteryear

Given the average user's ability to figure out that blue download buttons are not in fact download buttons, just ad sites that offer you your download by name but in fact give you malware, this is the correct decision

, final destination.

For those in the UK, BBC iPlayer has an old Horizon doc on this made shortly after the theorem was fixed currently. It's pretty good, and even has the old "lingering shot until the subject starts crying," except the subject is Wiles, getting emotional about his proof, and it's quite moving

Slow and buggy text editing!

I installed Linux Mint on a laptop a couple weeks ago and I used it about 8? hours over all before it had a kernel panic that screwed up its boot sequence (my diagnosis got as far as MDM or upstart itself being the culprit but I wasn't exactly gonna continue using it). I went to Arch instead--the setup time might look a bit tedious but I think it's invaluable in demystifying how to make linux behave the way you want it, rather than trying to prod a distro into something workable for you

The one boost error I've ever had come out of a program I was from boost::filesystem, but to be fair, I don't think the difference between Windows' "mklink /J" and "mklink /D" is documented properly anywhere