CC Veblens alma mater, here CU.
Table 3, (basic,infra)hardware+software in quadrant “club goods”, solved except in minds of some recalcitrant VCs, contentious is the diametrically opposite one.
232 karma · joined March 25, 2021
Table 3, (basic,infra)hardware+software in quadrant “club goods”, solved except in minds of some recalcitrant VCs, contentious is the diametrically opposite one.
[if forex, SPJ is allowed these days to be remembered for idealizing the shitting of pants..]
the idea of experts’ pants as a a commodity to die metaphorically for
(& one can e.g. with this explain, with mauvaise foi, Hipour’s smile)
Is the sage skeptical of education eg
(Carleton again, the hidden fortress?)
Thx for the raiding article, all the forexes in one place :)
And dont forget the (old) florentine skyscrapers, derived from germanic feuds? (G+G)
>>Gemeinsamkeit<<
(usually translated to English as neither C nor S)
(Also contrasted with Gesangverein)
[can we compare sarissa to Swiss pike]
And then there were the Habsburgs..
In your locality, are there no (nonplains-derived, eg not Monts+Caps of Ephesus) fairy tales of dynastic feuds? Valleys have always been fertile, livestock abundant ( so that driving term high enough to avert fratricide/eternal war with the eastern barbarians)? Northern thais didnt discover grazing/lactose until 1970s, and then ofc appalachia/scottish notterriblelands
[https://en.wikipedia.com/wiki/Badlands#Etymology]
Q: what shape are the castles in Castalia, if Castalia itself is in the form of a tower — ofc i will relate to the general structure of polynesia :)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41725625
Slavic muxa <-> lowland austrian/schwabian mugge <-/-> (??) maggot
*/Martianism aka Gyorgy-Marxism
[or a matriarchal order (Bene Gesserit?) vs Sith knights/knaves]
I shall join you in being charitable, in my case to YC’s secrecy (i.e. that they have a teleos, maybe a plan, but not the man :)
Our other man breck did not have sufficient bad [faith] to be effective enough to find a way to archive the vid. Now hes banned
The Apotheosis of Californication Is Neither Roman Nor British
Ps that was a helpful blogpost, as well as a very concrete wiki eg!
Thanks for distilling A&R: f(o)rex “thinking” and “writing” can be quite labor-intensive, but we’d like to have finer distinctions between the types — what kinds “should” be added vs replaced.. so we should also pay attention to exchange rates??
(as a first guess, optimizing shiny vs essential — “form follows function” for reverence [why dont hackernewsies revere brutalism?] — for bosons, fermions & everything in between)
riffing on that, designori will try to unify the shiny and the essential.. and though John “Designor” Henrys are memorialized, nobody sane would want to be John Henry …
question: how would “the central bank” help?
L: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/456414/what-is-decategori...
https://archive.org/download/Demian_201305/Demian_text.pdf
“How TM met HKH” backstory summarized for the proles here by yet another Nasr- https://archive.is/3JwSV
So the man called HKH a [Sith?] princebishop there? (No need to find the german edition as TM targeted an american audience)
“Ctrl-f River” will also direct you to the essential bits ;)
[some were only rusticated]
(In terms of the hiring process)
Lowland scots: tried to shoehorn into rustic theme
Yes. And communism — esp. the secrecy aspect, in relation to YC/SIGINT.. “waste is inevitable but rivalry is optional” {waste->pleasure,rivalry->reward} in same snowclone, so… universalism, too. And organized skepticism (like those paradoxical games where victory is uncorrelated with effort,motivation,or intent; Simplicitas’ dual, sprezzatura misses the point)
Wont be surprised if Nikolai Feodorovich turns out to have been a crypto-raskolnik all along
>Fyodorov opposed the idea of property of books and ideas and never published anything during his lifetime.
Right. Pietists would not be classified as weird in the Rao taxonomy, so radical pietists sounds just like hypernormal. So who indeed are the proweird antimeritocrats? Practical (entheogenic,texting) sufi-taoists? Such that friendly neighborhood incomprehensibility is very much an organization feature?
See also Merton Thesis,Mertonian Norms (dont know if that ever inspired sci-fi?)
「Becker 1992」
Question: are the Mertonian norms fundamentally inhospitable to meritocracy, so that they may yet serve as a viable target for the transmogrification of socalled antiintellualism?
>the scientific ethos does not have [its] theoreticians… but it has [its] [designori]
(Thats how we get distracted from discussion of designori,strategy,tactics,DDJ,shamans?)
Lmk of any specific questions you might have
[PG is interesting as lowland scottish SIGINT is surprisingly far from the “norwegian” style of “rational inattention”, IMHO, with regards to secrecy esp.]
[one observes, not tangentially, of Veblen’s meandering elocution vs PG’s plain prose]
you might be more interested in torsion, though..
Ps: i think edwardian eras are a transitional period where, to stand apart from the previous era fetishizing wisdom (& the payment of dues), intellectuals began to focus their attention on the (often full of youth & signaling sprezzatura) acolytes of truth (& no taxes)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann_algebra#Factors ?
Wikipedia calls them by a different name! As for history, Tomita is said to be the most important guy* behind the elucidation of Type III but gets no credit…
Feels like this is a classic case of blind men and elephant
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomita–Takesaki_theory
>These were further developed later by Takesaki, and the theory is called the Tomita–Takesaki theory. It has great influence in statistical mechanics too. That was the beginning part, but in Tomita’s papers, he didn’t write proofs. I: Mathematicians usually like proofs. Is Tomita a mathematician? A: [Minoru] Tomita is a pure mathematician. There are a lot of algebraists in Japan, including [Masamichi] Takesaki, but Tomita is a completely different kind of person, very “singular”.
(Shouldnt Pan the Smith be asleep here?)
From Mary of Teck (grandmothertongue, not RP) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PO9VEfOeOxo&t=2m9s
[39]: 212–213
Designer-driven eutykhopoiesis!