562 karma · joined July 6, 2017
I presume weight is heavily optimized to get 300kmph. So it won’t go that fast if it carries explosives. Could be used for high value target killing. Like literally a bullet you can control, might be able to make that work.
But for reconnaissance can’t the drone just go high up ? And then can’t really be shot down with a rifle ? You just need better optics.
My point is that I am an aspiring artist, who is waiting tables and I invest all my spare cash and time to get better at my craft and hopefully allow my craft to support me financially.
Any hope of financial benefit coming from my craft is quickly taken away by Dall-e. This has nothing to do with how much I enjoy my art.
When cameras were harder to use, you had national geographic taking you all over the world to photograph different locations because only you and a handful of people knew how to take a picture properly. Now you just hire a local person with a camera to go take the picture you want since it’s much easier to use a camera.
You had people doing photography for ads, now stock photography will do for most brands.
You had people buy high school portraits, I am not sure if people buy those anymore, but a picture of what you looked like in high school is worth a lot less when you can take a selfie every other day.
Notes app seem like an odd place to ask Google like questions.
Is it supposed to help me with writing long for text? Am I supposed to use it as a spell/grammar checker ?
This is not directly a question for your integration, but more of a general question for using local LLMs for long form text.
I’m sure some people would be more ok to work a shitty job with the hope that they might make it as an artist.
Now that it’s becoming more and more obvious they will not be an artist that’s better than AI, what do they have left to hope for ?
Clicking the controls too fast just zooms in and out
Good memories.
So really you end up with very few ads to display to customers.
Just because a human can lift 500lb, we will never build a machine that can lift more than that ?
Why is it so crazy to think that we, the tool building animals that we are, could also build a machine that things better than us, just how we built a crane ?
You can have 10 different ai systems, each one sub human intelligence and it would still disrupt the world in a huge way.
If you have a system that all it can do is take project requirements write java code really really well. That will already have a huge impact on everyday life.
Positive view: What would a world look like where everybody can program ?
People feel good about the future, they will buy that new TV or start that new business. And those actions will have very real consequences.
I think the survey mostly says that people think they will be able to afford food and shelter. I don’t think this is greed in the same sense.
Also the jump is big, but the actual value is pretty low considering historical values.
Given how many people are willing to burn themselves out because of their job I’m going to guess not too many.
I did not work in this field explicitly, but worked on Gaussian processes which were first used as a way to aggregate data like this from multiple sources to minimize the number of drillings required to find oil.
You can go down as a number on the spreadsheet, or you can show everyone else they are also numbers on a spreadsheet.
Her behaviour is a first step towards a different workplace. The effectiveness is questionable, but what more can a single, non organized individual can do ?
And I am also on the nas.api list.
In which case we will design a long term memory at first to gather the benefits that came come AGI.
Presumably any advances open source community makes towards running on cheap hardware, will also massively benefit the big guys.
In 200 years the goal will be the same, and hopefully we will have a better algorithm of eliminating the noise.
You would still read the exact same data you write, even if part of the process is not deterministic.
Since there are ~5000 dimensions, in which of those dimensions are we moving k out ?
Is the idea you just move, out, in all dimensions such that the final Euclidean distance is k ?
Seems that’s how they get multiple samples at those distances.
Either way I think it’s more interesting to go out in specific dimensions. Ideally there is a mapping between each dimension and something inherent about the token, like the part where a dimension corresponds with the first word of the token.
We went through this discovery phase when we were generating images using autoencoders, same idea, some of those dimensions would correspond to certain features of the image, so moving along them would change the image output in some predictable way.
Either way, I think the overall structure of those spaces says something about how the human brain works ( given we invented the language). I’m interested to see if anything neurologic can be derived from those vector embeddings.
Seems odd that their ex employer is all they could say about him
Think about all the startups that fail. People work really hard for two years, and then the whole thing fails with nothing to show for it.
In the grand scheme of things, no value was created, even though each day the people worked, value was created.