gregmolnar

I agree.

I agree, we shouldn't reinvent the wheel but it applies to "host of repositories" too :). There are already existing solutions so why spend time to build another one? Also when someone builds a product which does and look the same as another and even the name is very similar, it reminds me the Adidos(http://bit.ly/1aRN2IN) shoes. My point is at least make a different UI and choose a name which closes out confusion.

Way too similar. People should come up with new ideas instead of cloning someone else's work.

I don't know such a source but you may be able to find some after some research. Like Spree is an open source product but the company behind it employs developers to work on the product.

I am not sure what do you mean?

Maybe a kinda "Flag for close" button on the github interface would help with this. Than the community would be able to flag issues and the core devs could de-prioritize the flagged ones or if there are flags from enough members they can just close it without reading it assuming that many member is probably right?

Sorry, you are right :). Thanks for the plugin by the way!

I am also curious. Why do you feel the need to ask this question? Are envy because the guy made a nice tool or what?

Nice one again. @homakov thanks for sharing. Shame on github for their bounty policy.