1,353 karma · joined September 9, 2013
It really is the way forward.
My (insert large financial company) has mandatory testing too, and there are no strict examination conditions. But nobody cheats.
There is no real consequence if you fail, you just resit it again. At worst you might have to brute force it.
My guess is that it’s late 90’s hardware.
Upon a demonstration, at a multi-billion dollar financial company, it caused an error message but the account balance was actually incremented.
The quality of enterprise code is quite poor.
Australia has a long history of brand snobbery when it comes to car manufacturers. Most new entrants into the Australian market don’t make it long term.
Terrible computer, with great hardware. It was the beginning of ARM computing.
In a magical universe where your time is free.
I would be amazed if there was enough SAF available to reliably supply 1% of the world’s AirBus A320 fleet.
Until then it is only a gimmick.
Boeing said at the time the changes would improve quality.
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/boein...
The channel is required to make a certain percentage of Australian content, and without the need to worry about advertising, subscriber numbers and merchandising revenue, it has become a haven of local creativity.
I think Australia also struggles to find global audiences, as in some ways the world is still recovering from Australian craze global audiences had in the 90's (Crocodile Dundee, Crocodile Hunter, Mad Max, etc). So finding a new audience with children is perfect.
Therefore, I wonder how much your location impacts the amount of microplastics you consume.
If you are located in Los Angeles is your intake higher than someone from Winnipeg?
Is living in Australia or New Zealand significantly advantageous to living in Europe or the US?
If so, by how much?
That is impressively bad for a developed western economy.
I suspect the country would be in severe trouble if it wasn’t for their membership in the EU single market.
A 2TB MicroSD card really is a modern marvel in engineering.
> ...some interrogators reported thinking that ELIZA was “too bad” to be a current AI model, and therefore was more likely to be a human intentionally being uncooperative.