Human self-centredness is often insufferable.
325 karma · joined December 25, 2022
Human self-centredness is often insufferable.
The flip-side is: you need the money more than your employer needs you. Which puts you in a bad position to negotiate salary, makes it hard to stand-up against bad decisions, etc.
I think that it can (not sure if the author meant this) also mean that you have a buffer and are OK with switching jobs, but are also in a position where your employer wants you (because of something you can do). This puts you in a GREAT negotiation position.
I dislike CloudFlare for their extremely hostile stance against VPNs and for collecting a near autocratic control of a large part of the “world wide” web. I think that there are very valid concerns regarding that. And yes, that power is given to them by service providers, however also essential services use it and as a user I can not choose to not use your service without CF, so it’s still very much asymmetric.
This whole manufacturing of a fear culture, the emphasis on us-vs-them (ICE), loyalty oaths (MIT, pledges of CEOs), purging of institutions (doge), attempts to reorganize higher education (Harvard), control of media (Kimmel), the symbolism (maga), it’s all Trump 2.0 boring attempt at a ‘Cultural Revolution’ a la Mao. It’s just a bit messier because Trump never commits to much and blatantly chases much of his own selfish interests (crypto schemes and market manipulation).
I believe that the parallels that someone may draw between Biden and Mao are much much weaker.
I would say less than heart disease related ones.
To policy makers, well, terrorism is actionable but so is diabetes. And that while diabetes accounts for a far larger number of deaths.
So I think there is real asymmetry if we look at the data from an “actionable” perspective.
I meet a lot of people who interfaced with LLMs for about topics that they are not an expert in, and they now believe that AI is taking over.
What a bore.
This fine is a sham.
A 250k penalty? Get real. Leffel said it like it is. What a sham.
They wrote “In doing so, Israeli authorities are responsible for the crime against humanity of extermination and for acts of genocide” [1].
Thank you for clearing up what the Israeli state officials are responsible for. We are saying the same thing, but you want to dance around it.
You are shockingly uninformed. All major human rights organizations are saying the exact same thing: Israel is actively committing a genocide.
The point I made is that firing 80% of the workforce was not showing other CEOs that that is such a value generating move (as the person above me implied).
The company also dropped 80% in value [1]. I don’t think Musk his value destruction at Twitter is that inspirational.
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/02/business/elon-musk-twitter-x-...
To summarize, you believe that because X once called X’s algo open-source, that it must be open-source (“unless proven otherwise”) in the comment section of an article that (again) explains that Twitter censors any unwanted opinions for self-interest.
I think the Flavor Aid remark was entirely warranted.
I haven’t given this much thought, but my gut feeling is that it should be OK for a big company to acquire a smaller one if both sides agree and it’s not blatant anti-trust material (as with Meta acquiring Instagram).