hateduser2

They can’t be exclusive of each other if I successfully hold both at once

There are lots of quotes in the OP article that side with GP. Without having done research myself I think it’s plausibly true and the article is full of quotes that suggest this is the case. Your tone is hostile and that makes me disinclined to take your view. Overall I would side with GP over you and I’d hope other users who haven’t done research themselves would too. Don’t let your biases inform your opinions!

Agreed. Whether or not you think grammar matters, bringing it up is destructive to the conversation this is meant to start.

Are you suggesting my fashion should be influenced by the chance that the police my murder me over it?

What qualifiers? They said they haven’t and never would do anything to shorten or harm device life. That’s as direct as it gets. This isn’t a weasel word message, sorry.

This is indirectly pro consumer of Apple. This means they can engineer for the current gen. Everyone on all platforms should only be served the latest and greatest!

Are you sure that iOS 11 is as bad as you say? I use it on a 7 and have no problems. maybe you just like to hate Apple, Silicon Valley, or change?

Give me a break please. From the post:

>First and foremost, we have never — and would never — do anything to intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades. Our goal has always been to create products that our customers love, and making iPhones last as long as possible is an important part of that.

I see 0 weasel words or dodging here. Give me a break hacker news. Thanks.

That’s not actually true. That’s androids Demo, not apples.

If what they do is actively and solely intendedto be hostile to you (without provocation), yes.

Or for people who don’t care about morals and just want free stuff.

I don’t think “it’s always happened this way so it probably will continue “ (although you explain this further) is a very sophisticated or for that matter accurate analysis. There’s the status quo and then there are major events that upend it. If anything could ever upend the status who like this, it’s tech. It’s like business cycles.. usually things are fine but they aren’t always fine.

The people who the bot targeted were impersonating Jews and spreading anti Semitic. That’s not a position, that’s abuse. Is the relevance clear now?

I guarantee you the abuse the author receives is not from Muslims.

Is abuse a position?

I don’t know why you assert that that’s where error handling should happen because I disagree. My thought was that promises were for values that are calculated asynchronously or anyways aren’t immediately available. They support errors but I don’t think this means that all code which emits errors should use promises to do error handling, that seems like a bastardization of the original idea.

Your potential true friends will. Also, it’s not just about your true friends anyways, is it? There’s more to why we like social media than just that (although granted you qualified your statement). Anyways I don’t want to make it harder for you to quit but I don’t think misleading yourself (intentionally or not) and others is the right way to do it.

The other side says that there’s a 75% chance of not failing ten times in a row. What this says is that it probably doesn’t just happen when it’s a sure thing.

The original post even mentions that it’s if deployed on a wide enough scale. The point is that f it is, it will end traffic. I haven’t seen any arguments that address what they’re talking about it here in this thread so far.

I’ll gladly ride in the crapton express. It’s more important to save money on frequent purchases than rare large ones.

How do you not use loops?

Nothing you said here changed my view, I feel like you’ve just obscured the point.

You can’t even say it’s an information problem. I constantly do the wrong thing even though I know many people or a particular person thinks it’s a bad idea. Because I don’t have their conviction in its wrongness.

Wouldn’t a text renderer live outside of the xi backend? So you’d have to write one for each front end? Maybe not?

>it seems to work fine in the real world

I thought the whole premise of this conversation was that this is a total fabrication?

I like the discussion. Don't even read the articles.

I don’t think you should write off anti philosophers like this, although I don’t know wat you know about them.

You can hear the chirps occasionally.

Its both!

No right or wrong? Why not?