173 karma · joined May 9, 2015
The most serious objection to the propositions in the article is refuted at the beginning, when they agree that our future will be tied to one planet - "I assume you’re happy to confine our conversation to Earth". There are good reasons to expect that this will be invalidated somewhen in the next 400 years.
> Due to negative implications surrounding the word propaganda because of its use by the Germans in World War I, he promoted the term "Public Relations".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays#Life_and_influe...
For more I recommend the BBC documentary "The Century of the Self".
Microsoft, please get your stuff together. Hire some privacy aware people.
Be creative: unbounded exponential growth would mean, for instance, that at some point in the future the global yearly energy consumption would be higher than what E=mc^2 suggests for m=mass of the earth.
Not to mention centralized efforts, such as QE, which are literally aimed at jobs creation, regardless of their value.
The bigger problem here is that bone marrow transplant is by itself more dangerous than an antiretroviral-controlled HIV infection. Not to mention that CCR5 deletions are quite rare.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hematopoietic_stem_cell_transp...
> Considering consequences, it's probably even more important to be able to take criticism on doing active harm to others than to take criticism on the importance of garbage collection.
All three major operating systems, this is Windows, Mac OS and Linux, all have or had leaders (Gates, Jobs, Torvalds) that on numerous occasions proved themselves to be harsh and very open about their criticism. One might want to say - they were/are class-A assholes. What we want to believe is one thing, but the recent history of major operating systems disagrees with your point of view.
You are not the code you write. Accept the critical comments and improve.
JavaScript is incomparably slower than Fortran. Also, Fortran has been fast since day 0.
Edit: I've just found out that "restrict" has been added in C99. Which means that even in the 90s there was no good support for parallel/vectorized code in the C standard.
Are you trying to say that the current Germany is not the direct descendant of the Nazi Germany? Then how did it come into existence? Is it a brand new nation conjured out of thin air after the Yalta and Potsdam conferences?
Pay attention please that I did not say that it is the same nation, but that it is the direct descendant. Surely the majority of living Germans had nothing to do with NSDAP, because they were born after 1945.
This is on a certain level very similar to positive discrimination regulations in the US. One could say - declare a law that states it is illegal to discriminate basing on race, gender or sexual orientation. The problem is that such a law is too weak - it does not serve its purpose in practice. Similarly, the generic and good anti-defamation law needs support in the most extreme cases.
> In our case, three initial left-singular vectors contribute 70.1%, 8.5%, and 3.6% of the total variance of R, respectively.
I am asking about these two specifically because they make the biggest difference between the "western" culture and the Chinese culture. The other items on your list also appear in the lives of the citizens of many European/European based countries.
But to be fair, the risk is not minuscule - for example the murder rate is 4-5 times higher in the US than it is in Europe. The only two times in my life I was close to being beaten up was during my few months visit to California.