hedvig

Exactly - having enough capital to waste in this way IS a morality issue.

So we need to get rid of this "independent contractor" loophole.

Sure you can. We're still ethical reasoning humans at the end of the day.

How long would've it taken to download everything? And what size disk would you need to mirror it?

This should not fall to the patrons. This is the problem of the business model. Remove tipping as an option, price the meals, and pay the employees a wage.

It shouldn't fall to me to pay a business's employees directly. The business should pay its own employees.

FCC has been coopted by industry, so I don't think that excuse flies anymore.

"nobody wants to raise rates to generate cash for upgrades."

So maybe we change that mindset, rayiner.

No its not. That's a huge distinction - these services are held in the public's interest. Not for the profit motive of small group of shareholders. And things like demand having any control or the idea that you can really switch to the "competition" don't actually exist.

Where were you when all of these private companies built-in backdoors for law enforcement anyways.

The greatest recession since the 1930s, caused by the similar wild west speculative innovation, and the victims on the lower end get depicted as strategic wolves somehow.

There's no error in hand offs. Attending doctors are detached and spend just a little time with a patient during their stay. Nurses and PAs do most of the work.

This would be easy to do a controlled experiment to compare.

Oh god forbid an potential employee feels he has some power in this transaction.

This goes hand in hand with the fact that its just ornaments around a landscape built for cars. We need to rework the land and our communities based on just humans walking about. Rip up the roads.

We need to disempower shareholders.

Why do they enable their ridiculous orthodox subset?

Your logic boils down to: because its not as bad as CO2 its not bad?

Those that aren't born into wealth - controlled by rents or controlled by debts. Those with capital - can control others by rents or control others by credit. What great options.

An insurance company is incentivized to NOT provide service, so no, it doesn't make sense to be profit-driven.

I don't know that its specific to Amazon but more generally comes from a core ideology of abiding by concepts of free market rules to the exclusion of concepts of humanity.

Does it make sense that they get the same number of senate seats as California?

I like how easily you separate groups of men in "government" from groups of men in "corporations"

Why aren't there developers that are willing to make 17% margins instead of 20% margins? You know what I'm saying. Related Group has always been happy to and does to this day build luxury units that get scooped up by elite Venezuelans and Russians. Who will build non-luxury units? The owners will claim they're luxury for the next 40 years, so there's no real trickle down effect.

Supply side economics dominates. There is no such thing as authentic demand.

What NFL rule changes handicapped defenses, just curious?

I mean, if she shot up youtube because she got worked up by another alt-right 4chan conspiracy theory, then you'd have a point. But she wasn't, she was upset youtube wasn't paying her enough.

I think we all agree phone companies should reconsider allowing telemarketers to buy lines from them.

Submission. Dystopia.

> charity being run for the benefit of the employees.

Whose benefit then?

Well, probably a majority of us agree that this can be controlled from the top and not have to cross our fingers and rely on low-informed consumers to change things.