She's a nice lady, but 9 months to incubate? Her mother definitely did other things in that time.
1,126 karma · joined February 15, 2012
Socials: - x.com/Ifthenalex
Interests: Art, Books, Climate Tech, Freelancing, Gaming, Hardware, IoT, Legal Tech, Mentorship, Music, Open Source, Robotics, Science, Startups, UI/UX Design
---
Web: https://www.Alex slade.com
She's a nice lady, but 9 months to incubate? Her mother definitely did other things in that time.
Countless examples from forums and elsewhere of the same issues.
Shame, because the hardware is cool.
You should easily be able to spot this misinformation. A re-useable bag is not 2500x more emissions than a disposable.
Edit: Yes! The terms also used are "sympathy boycotts", which this clearly is.
If you care about new models coming out soon, you can check https://buyersguide.macrumors.com/
(There’s a chance the M3 is about to be released)
Am I right in thinking the platform got bought a little while ago, and it’s being run by a relatively small outfit?
Phoenix is wonderful for web apps, LiveView makes UIs about 2x easier and faster.
For more interesting electronics MVPs I still use Elixir + Nerves for prototyping.
This was my track, it will be different for others, but: seniority meant understanding user / business problems and then making better decisions about what to build.
I enjoy the quip that “juniors find complicated solutions to simple problems, mids find complex solutions to complex problems and seniors find simple solutions for complex problems”.
Sometimes the best thing you can do as a dev is to re-frame the problem, and I think a certain level of experience or confidence is needed to do that. But you can definitely cultivate the skill and get there sooner.
Or ideally there'll be some nice export process out of the chat itself.
Give me an environment where the test suite passes for this new repo I've cloned, based on all the environment config inside.
- Finds versions, sets them up
- Installs packages
- Asks about conflicts or problems
- Notes why the tests fail first time (no DB!)
- Creates the DB, runs migrations
- Notes why the tests fail next time (missing env variable)
- Finds a similar env variable in the example file, creates and local env file
- etc etc
That's all possible now if you paste the messages into GPT (with some errors, which repeated attempts can resolve), it needs connecting up into a self-aware environment.
The repo is also here - https://github.com/alexslade/gpt-game
2 are elixir apps that have been created on fly, 1 was an elixir app I had running on heroku, and 1 was rails app on heroku I recently migrated. I used their heroku migrator and it worked pretty much automatically. I had a few steps to follow to move the DB, but their docs covered it - https://fly.io/docs/rails/getting-started/migrate-from-herok...
I didn't want a self-hosted flavor of Heroku, and I value an opinionated and active community around the platform. I'll mirror another comment here:
> Everyone wants to be the new Heroku, but that should be table stakes. Fly is innovative in the same way Heroku was when it launched.
https://it.cornell.edu/gsuite-gsuite-student-facstaff-email/...
Last I checked, the ledger on Bitcoin and Ethereum are functionally identical. A value against a wallet address. There are no "accounts" on either.
You’ve failed at the first hurdle then. This is to remove all negotiation and give candidates some advance assurance of their remuneration.
https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc7231.html#rfc.section.6.3.5
> The 204 (No Content) status code indicates that the server has successfully fulfilled the request and that there is no additional content to send in the response payload body.
I don't see how that could be intepreted to mean "You have requested a resource which does not exist". It's intended for use cases like "Your request to save the file has been received, no further content will be sent".
Or am I misreading the spec?
Hugely simplifies the overall stack. Combine with TailwindCSS, TailwindUI.com, and you have some very powerful tooling at a low development cost.
The files you've chosen to use don't appear to show any difference between iteration 1 and 2, so one of your major features doesn't do anything. Is that a bug, or accidental? (I'm using Firefox 101 on MacOS 11.4).
My personal dumb suggestion: give a few demos, showing off the very worst points of code review hell, and how crocodile fixes each one. Make it a game. E.g.
"You're halfway through a large code review, and Sally has just added 2 new commits, ugh. Challenge: find the button to see the new additions, then decide if you want to include them in your current review, or review this iteration first and the new additions separately."
"Simon has just added a merge commit that fucks everything up, all the files look weird. Challenge: there's a way you can trivially see that the PR before this extra commit was looking great."
"You can spot a new method that was introduced, and you'd like to see the places where it's being called, but that's a lot of scrolling back and forth. Challenge: find how to show code hints on a selected piece of text"
Nothing special, just some information for folks who might look me up. (I'm CTO of a gaming startup, so whilst I'm always interested in advisory roles and part-time consulting, I'm not actively looking for work).
And they can be quite strict about only allowing projects that are nearly complete. It's extremely common for a boardgame, or other project to be "complete" but need a tonne of investment for production, shipping, etc.
Seems like the perfect model for a book launch. And the fans get what they want too with all the bonuses.