I will be very interested to see it after a year of polish however.
277 karma · joined October 23, 2013
I will be very interested to see it after a year of polish however.
That "dropping pretense" you describe carries a LOT more weight than you are giving it, in who it attracts, and the behaviors it promotes.
Some projects I spent more thinking on, but especially where specs and design are more vague, I approach it from front to back
It's "ok", but doesn't play nicely with any 3rd party anything.
Even rails 6 ships with webpacker by default and they have included an API mode for a while...
Phoenix live view on the other hand is totally awesome and goes along with your point
But the flip side is, why not? What else do we have to do...
The planet WILL be fine, the solar system, universe, existence.. Yea, in the big scheme of things it WILL be fine. Conservation is about conservation of the human species, and there is no reason we shouldn't talk about it like that.
Honestly, more right wing / anti-environmentalists would probably respond better if they understood how dire the threat to humanity is.
I also have a fair amount of different IRL/internet friend groups who all have their own channels.
I will say I feel like the pricing isn't very competitive with other carriers, as it was ~2 years ago. Fi is a great choice for someone who knows they will be on WiFi the majority of the time, and want to keep your wireless bill <50$ a month. Once you start using data, it gets pretty expensive, even with their recent data cap protection.
Standups aren't inherently bad. Also it sounds like he moved his team to more of a kanban style workflow -- which many people use already. That isn't ground breaking. There is still iterative planning, even if they aren't "sprint planning" sessions.
1) It isn't clear what is clickable and what isn't, I feel like I should be able to click on the blue comment badges and see related comments (or is that # related to requested change count?)
2) Secondarily to this, when I click on a dom element, it automatically defaults to the inspector tab, when I feel like this gets too deep for a product owner just wanting to make comments on a section
3) I am not clear on what the difference between a red highlight box around elements and a blue one means
After looking at it a few minutes more, other than the comments above, I think you are thinking about it in the right way. I feel like there are levels of depth/advanced features that should feel more progressive -- right now it seems like feature overload on that first view. Maybe the default view is just something where you can click on dom elements and add comments, the second "tab" is "Request Markup Changes" where there are no comments -- when you select an element you can make markup changes with the advanced inspector and there is a history of those, and then you might could even get rid of the "screenshot" view. Or maybe mix the screenshot "highlight area" functionality with the first/non-dev oriented commentary tab/view
Sorry if that last paragraph isn't concise, I can rewrite it better if some of it wasn't helpful. Also this is all obviously just my opinion
Edit: I made edits above ^ Edit: Last edit. I also notice the UI/UX seems a bit different on your landing page demo vs what is present in the demo link. I personally kinda like the comments having their own dedicated space to the left of the page, then you could toggle the advanced inspector tab on the right, in and out cleanly. Not sure if there is a way to change the comments to the left currently, or that was a previous build. But I feel like it addresses some of my commentary above.
Edit: I see the screenshot view is sorta closer to what I am getting at. Either way, sounds like you guys are solving an interesting problem and should be easy to communicate the value if you clean up the UX. I just was overwhelmed at first.
I'm sure everyone agrees this is a big achievement for these students, move along.
A) Americans need to be more health centric. Half the problem is that a minority of chronic patients account for 50% of the costs.
Drive through rural America, fast food is the only option. Grocery shopping at Dollar stores and gas stations.
Solving Americas obesity epidemic is step one in fixing US healthcare.
B) Big pharma regulations. I like the idea of importing drugs and creating more competition. I also think it should be a national embarrassment that we let drug companies advertise to people. Drug decisions should be between doctors and their patients, not patients and the marketing wing of a big pharma company.
C) More access to preventative care. Maybe socializing everything healthcare is way too much to ask right now. But, EVERYONE should have access to regular doctor appointments at least for annual checkups. Earlier recognition of problems will greatly cheapen downstream costs if people aren't waiting till they are having a heart attack to seek care.
These are just a few pragmatic approaches imo.
Inconsistent card verification, ID verification is pretty much broken (intentionally or not).
It does a very good job with neuropathic pain though.
Like.... medical marijuana?
Hard to believe you wrote those three sentences without putting two and two together.
Regardless if I partially agree with you, further criminalizing marijuana is also NOT the solution to opioid deaths.
There are huge tournaments every month, a huge twitch scene, etc
Its a legit game and most people know what they are getting into.
DBZ Dokkan battle on the other hand....