hhmc

Why is this conspiratorial? It’s simply a theory, no?

Not in the UK (passthrough sugar tax)

sometimes also 'niner' instead of 'nine' for similar reasons.

What happened?

3 years is plenty if the sharpe is high enough (it probably isn’t, but GP’s comment about volatility of returns is important here)

I'm with you, incredibly vapid content

> difficulty in valuing the land

This seems by _far_ the biggest difficulty, and I find it strange that this rarely comes up in LVT discussions. Even for nominally 'liquid' land it's not clear who values it or how.

What's the solution? A powerful enough regulatory framework to fine (or otherwise punish) proven misinformation?

Even then it's probably hard to prove that insufficient checking was performed at publication time

I've seen (rarely) unlimited with enforced minimum, which fixes the worst problems

Got it, my misunderstanding!

FWIW many game developers would genuinely rather you pirate the game than buy keys on the ‘grey market’ sites. If you’re not going to pay anyone who deserves it, you might as well just not pay anyone..

> that ignored the studio sensibilities

I mean, it's strongly 'inspired' by dwarf fortress, so any heterodox design credit mostly belongs there

Aomngst all the dicsussion of reddit's flawed business model, I haven't seen much conjecture into how they _should have done it_. Clearly they need to make money at some point -- I'm curious if they ever had a route to do this that wouldn't alienate their userbase?

Its right wing broadsheet counterpart -- the telegraph - just filed for bankruptcy. So I don't think there's any counterfactual to support your 'arugment'.

Perhaps he’s buying deep out of the money puts instead of actually shorting

What prejudices would these be?

How? If I said that I think >99% of people have 2 arms, a photo of a one armed man doesn't refute it.

one photo isn't data

If your claim is that 'finance bros' (perhaps let's call them commodity traders) don't consider anything about the fundamentals of the underlying, then you simply have no meaningful understand of trading.

Similarly you can precompute a dictionary for the Cartesian product of the dictionary with itself, then lookup into that.

Big in space but O(1) (wrt word len at least)

Not the part of the mortgage that's accumulated interest -- which is going to be considerable at current rates.

You are gated from almost nothing in London on £140K -- the only meaningful exception would be buying a house in a central location

This is a great comment, and the examples are compelling for the 3 quadrants you mentioned.

But what about jobs with intrinsic ability required but not a lot of training -- I think something like bouncer/doorman might be an example of this -- but what would the white collar equivalent be? How automatable would those be?

Is whatsapp meaningfully different than, say, imessage in this context?

Even if neovim never gathers critical mass, it must be considered a success purely for how much of a fire it has lit under vim development.

Change, but not materially, maybe 5% or something that doesn't really move the needle like the claim of 500 calories.

It's 'basal metabolic rate' not 'base', and it's not going to change materially over a year, even with a shift to inactivity.

How is a downloadable gui at all comparable?

> When you attempt a 250 lb squat and your body shuts down and just collapses under the weight you learn things you cannot learn any other way.

This is one of those glib statements that sounds reasonable, but is clearly meaningless on any real thought. It’s like saying you can’t understand high energy physics without personally being collided with a particle at 3 TeV.

You're just presupposing the researchers don't know anything about strength training, any basis for that other than some lazy guess?