199 karma · joined February 7, 2014
http://bit.ly/1dOAbq9+ (preview)
1. http://chrishateswriting.com/post/76431353368/the-anonymity-...
Cram thousands of users into a hall using all sorts of versions and customizations of Windows along with A/B testing, heat maps etc. to figure out the fastest and easiest way to get a thing done. This way users won't have to spend hours trying to customize their Windows (read: disable all the new stuff).
Also maybe throw a world-wide design contest to find the best suited man / woman to be responsible for a new Windows2 design.
Like they say, "perfection is achieved, not when there's nothing left to add, but when there's nothing left to take away".
Yes, support for Linux is much more wide-spread, but that's due to marketing and not the quality of the OSes themselves.
As for Passenger vs Puma, no management and administration tool is more superior than the Unix commandline. Plus, you don't need fancy sandboxing features assuming your OS user account is properly secured in the first place.
You mention superior this and that, but I find it all hard to swallow as I know you guys go around spamming Puma-related articles and tutorials with stuff about Passenger.
Also, with the existence of Puma, I don't see why anybody would want to use Passenger.
Also, http://puma.io/.