1,951 karma · joined January 3, 2019
1. Have a central location for our helm charts so that we have one copy of our charts with separate values for our various environments.
2. Have tight controls around who is allowed push what where (allow devs to push to the dev environment, allow team leads push to QA, etc.)
Separately each goal is easy to accomplish, but if you want both, it seems to break the GitOps paradigm. Multiple branches or repos means you now have helm templates all over the place and quickly you get drift. Having one branch and repo consolidates your templates, but now you need to either allow any dev to change any value for any environment, or you have to slowdown your devs and gatekeep the repo and only those who are allowed to make prod changes are responsible for merging in ALL changes to every environment.Ultimately it seems like the best compromise is you end up with multiple deployments of Argo/Rancher (whatever CD tool you have), which monitor your helm charts pointing at least two separate repos, one that is for non-prod, and another that is prod.
Make sure the lawyer would be willing to work on a contingency fee basis if you had to go after someone who broke the NDA.
It’s pretty normal, and just, to have special rules when there is a conflict of interest.
Yes, clearly.
How so? In what capacity are “most businesses” getting federal money? Tax credits/breaks don’t count, that is the companies money that they don’t have to pay, not the federal government directly funding the business.
It's so sad how many "smart" people STILL believe that mRNA coivd vaccines are SaFe AnD EfEcTiVe. It is quite clear from studies and evidence they they are most certainly neither safe or effective.
Just to name few.
That's nothing more than talking point with no evidence.
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic, or if you're completely delusional. But either way this statement is patently false.
"Thanks!"
"You're still going to see Grandpa though."
That would be how I would handle it.
>As a student, I thrive on structure and routine, and I've worked hard to establish a productive daily routine that helps me stay on track with my goals. Being away from home, even for a day, would mean abandoning my routine and risking falling behind on my schoolwork
Life is always going to throw you curve balls kid, you aren't some delicate vase. You need to learn to roll with the punches, be flexible, and adapt. You'll manage.
> For example, I've been meaning to catch up on some reading, explore a nearby hiking trail, ...
Spend less time watching TV, playing video games, being on your phone when you are not on vacation and read or go for a hike instead. If it is important to your well being you should make it a higher priority.
>If a class has two methods and one of them is __init__ it doesn't need to be a class.
That seems like dumb advice to me. I don't use classes often in Python, but when I do it is typically because I have a more complex data set to work with and I don't really need database. Usually this is a class that ONLY has an __init__ function in it. Having data set that is a dictionary with nested dictionaries, with nested arrays ,etc. gets ugly and often you end up with a mess of loops trying to parse the data. I find classes super helpful here and would just instance a bunch of class objects with attributes I need, then put all those objects in a list. You can then iterate over a nice, simple, clean, list of you objects and access any attribute you wish. Without having to do nested loops trying to dig down the the value you want.
1. This article is specific to the UK, not the US.
2. The article is published by an Electrical company, obviously as PR piece to make it look like they have things under controll. This is not an idependaty study.
3. One the "solutions" to the problem the UK came up with is regulations which state:
>The regulations ensure charge points have smart functionality, allowing the charging of an electric vehicle when there is less demand on the grid, or when more renewable electricity is available. The regulations also ensure that charge points meet certain device-level requirements, enabling a minimum level of access, security and information for consumers.In other words, even the grid the UK cannot handle an influx of EV's to combat this they are making the charge points "smart" (i.e. you won't be able to charge your vehicle when you wish only when the "smart" point says demand is low enough). This is hardly a solution. It attempts to "spread" out the charging with these "smart points", the problem is most people work during the day (and are parked somewhere where they cannot charge) and will want to charge at night. This would leave many SOL when they wake up to find their vehicle hasn't charged at all.
Hard, fucking, pass. Additionally, EV's are complete non-starter until they can go from 0% charge to full charge in 2 min or less IMO. If am on a road trip and trying to make good time I am not waiting around an hour+ for my vehicle to charge. Until charging is as easy and quick as pumping gas I have no interest in an EV.
No one really cares if one app is banned. But you should be VERY concerned with the sweeping measures the bill would actually accomplish.
Mostly true, it's been a long time since Microsoft made a CONSUMER operating system.
Windows Server isn't plagued with this crap, it costs a whole lot more, but doesn't have this nonsense. Also, isn't designed to be a desktop, the recommend install model these days is to install without the desktop gui (you basically get a powershell prompt, and that's it).
Please don’t say crypto.
I wouldn't say simply having at 2-3 hour take home by itself is red flag. But if the take home is a pile of hot garbage (poorly or inadequate documentation on how to setup a local env for example) then that is red flag.
My first hire (that wasn't someone I knew/previously worked with) I did not require that they complete a take home test. That hire turned out to be a complete disaster. I have since started requiring take home tests, and I will never again hire anyone that I don't know without a take home test. After requiring take home tests the candidates that have been hired have been much better.
It doesn't have to be a docker run.
>I can think of several well documented setups that can take upward of 2 hours
If ALL you have is "well documented" setups that take 2 hours, then that company sucks.
Look you don't have to have docker, but if you have a setup that is merely a Confluence page, or a pdf file, and don't have ANY shell scripts, or any way whatsoever to bootstrap setting up your environment locally, then that is a massive red flag.