Their pricing seems to rely on customers that don't maximize power consumption and hardware wear all the time, and I can fully understand if they ban specific use-cases like this from their hardware.
1,690 karma · joined November 4, 2015
Their pricing seems to rely on customers that don't maximize power consumption and hardware wear all the time, and I can fully understand if they ban specific use-cases like this from their hardware.
Is their assessment correct? If so, how comes that we got DTrace in 2019 and now eBPF ported to Windows? Are they trying to consolidate all tooling into one platform?
A seemingly minor update might cause a huge cascade of dependency updates which causes common Linux distributions to tend to one of these two extreme solutions: Either fix all packages in place and freeze their version numbers or just "give up" and update everything all the time. Both solutions feel like compromises to me.
Other end-user OSes don't act like this. On Android/iOS/macOS/Windows, I can have the latest 3rd party software without having to deal with intrusive updates to the OS infrastructure all the time. The BSDs handle this better, and maybe something like Ubuntu LTS + Nix on top of it might be a way around this.
The app itself and their GitHub repo feel abandoned, so I wouldn't be surprised if they announce its discontinuation.
Does Red Hat monitor the mouse travel distance to measure "employee productivity," or how did they end up with this design?
It is also mentioned on today's changelog: https://www.notion.so/What-s-New-157765353f2c4705bd45474e5ba...
[0] https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2021/02/22/gitlab-13-9-rel...
Fastmail's web app feels faster, uses fewer resources, and has the same UI on all of my computers.
Instead of redirecting all other accounts into Fastmail, it has a simple UI to setup fetching-from and sending-as from other mail providers, and with using my own domain, it does not feel like a lock-in.
I barely noticed any CPU usage from GDFS, and Dropbox.exe was also somewhat reasonable, but the fans of the MacBook Air next to me started screaming.
There is something wrong with their Mac client, and with GDFS, the old MBA remains quieter, and the battery life improved as well.
Unloading entire subtrees and restoring them on other computers is also a nice feature that I don't want to miss anymore.
The extension is closed source, and its dev sometimes needs a few weeks for important fixes, but it is still one of my most favorite browser extensions out there.
For GSuite/Workspace this needs to be enabled by an admin: https://support.google.com/a/answer/9121487?hl=en
These ports will be removed soon due to their Python 2 dependency, and the available versions are not supported anymore [2].
[1] https://www.freshports.org/search.php?query=electron&search=...
About 2: I have no idea how difficult this is. Microsoft makes it look easy, but on the other hand, Apple is about to remove any 3rd party code out of their kernel.
About 1: I believe that this hurts more than it helps. Expecting nVidia to move their OS-agnostic codebase into the Linux kernel sounds like a massive effort with no real benefit for them. That seems unlikely to happen. With, for example, OpenZFS, this might be possible if Oracle relicenses their last open-source version. Still, I don't see the Android OEMs budging on their stance of releasing binary blobs alongside their SoCs.
Android is currently the largest install base of Linux kernels across the world, and the lack of a stable ABI means that none of these devices can run the latest and greatest Linux version ever during their lifetime. It is easy to shove all the blame over to Qualcomm, Mediathek, etc. but we also have to see it as a failure of Linux as a platform.
Not every participant of a platform will always play nice, and these kinds of issues could all be solved by providing a stable ABI.
Raindrop certainly looks better, but Pinboard seems to have better integrations across other services. Those permanent archives are nice to have, but it does not feel that permanent without a local copy and a perceived bus-factor of 1 on both of them.
I requested an Archive Backup in my Pinboard settings, but I am still waiting for a download link three weeks later.
Thankfully, those bookmarks.html exports and imports seem to be very reliable across different bookmarking services.
Is this a trade-off between optimizing for latency vs. optimizing for throughput, and Linux chose the latter?
This non-disruptive introduction into Vimium made me think about my old Firefox setup. Back in the XUL days, I was hoarding dozens of add-ons that altered the Firefox UI to the extent that others could not use my browser anymore. They would click on a link and wonder why it is not working while my browser would amass many new tabs at a customized, designated place. The browser worked as I intended, but the extent of my customizations made it unusable for regular Firefox users.
Therefore I think that these new, more limited extension APIs offer an overall better experience for end-users. Maintaining usability for "regular users" should be the upper bound for the amount of customization an extension API provides. If it goes beyond that, it seems to get out of control.
The most ergonomic mice are usually from one of these gaming companies, so it is difficult to avoid them. But their drivers are over-stylized bloatware, and their useless colored LEDs are covered by my hand once I start using the device.
https://images7.memedroid.com/images/UPLOADED127/56473bf64a6...
My new approach uses dedicated apps for each use case. I am trying Raindrop.io (or Pinboard.in) as web clippers / persistent bookmark managers, I am using Todoist to organize (and gamify) my tasks, and I use VSCode for general note-taking. Especially VSCode, with its vast extension marketplace, seems to be a balanced solution for customizing the note-taking experience. I can pick my preferred Markdown extension with LaTeX math support and add additional comfort features like TabNine or Grammarly for a better writing experience than whatever these one-size-fits-all solutions such as Evernote or Notion can offer.
Do people with unsupported macOS versions still need to modify each patch release or can they update their macOS X.Y.Z to X.Y.(Z+1) without any additional tinkering?
Is there some standard way in *nix/Windows to create artificial CPU load while actually not increasing the energy consumption at all?
This could have been interesting if I could use it with arbitrary IMAP/SMTP accounts, but I have no idea how well their additional features could be mapped back to ordinary IMAP folders.
How is Apple's approach going to be different from Microsoft's? Will they keep backward compatibility? Will the CPU architecture really be a day and night difference or are our expectations too high due to the ubiquity of inflated Geekbench numbers?
This will either make or break the Mac as a platform and I feel like currently, any further investment would be a gamble.
Can you look at https://www.linuxfoundation.org/membership/members/ and easily point out those companies, that have a crucial business stake on Linux on the desktop? I can't.
Most people, who are paid to work on Linux and its surrounding ecosystem, are working for companies that are interested on Linux on servers / the cloud and I don't think that it is fair to criticize them for not joining the idealistic movement of bringing Linux onto more desktops.