In my experience half the things I ran in Wine ran better in it than Windows.
So depending on what you want to run, not only did Wine catch up bit also surpassed.
8,063 karma · joined February 13, 2017
https://pastebin.com/raw/bmTqd9eR
Sample output:
02 /\bErlang\b/
04 /\bHaskell\b/i
12 /\b(Angular|Angular5|Angular6)\b/i
13 /\b(PHP|PHP5|PHP7)\b/i
15 /\b(Kotlin)\b/i
15 /\b(Scala)\b/i
15 /\b(Swift)\b/i
16 /C#/i
16 /\b(Vue|VueJS)\b/i
18 /\b(Rust)\b/i
36 /\b(Java)\b/i
37 /\b(Ruby)\b/i
39 /\b(Go|GO|Golang|golang|GOLANG)\b/
47 /\bC\b|C\+\+/i
60 /\b(Node|NodeJS)\b/i
84 /\b(JS|JavaScript)\b/i
95 /\b(Python)\b/i
147 /\b(React|ReactJS)\b/iSo depending on what you want to run, not only did Wine catch up bit also surpassed.
Now you have to walk around with a USB hub, for a subpar battery life.
https://i.imgur.com/mHvtuz8.png
After some quick tests it seems faster than Sonnet 4.5 and slighly less smart than Opus 4.5/4.6.
But given the small 128k context size, I'm tempted to keep using GPT-5.3-Codex which has more than double context size and seems just as smart while costing the same (1x premium request) per prompt.
I have my reservations against OpenAI the company but not enough to sacrifice my productivity.
Question is, will the community continue with this level of engagement on the project now that it has OpenAI stamp on it?
I highly doubt. A fork? Maybe.
The strenght of openclaw is the massive community adherence.
It can connect to a ton of things.
It's like the https://zapier.com meets LLMs.
"should be considered experimental because there is important followup work to be done"
I guess not clear enough to some people.
But in the video he says they are starting with critical systems first.
Emphasis on starting.
So yeah, not as pervasive as you, the evangelists or that video title implies.
Specially because it's not a drop-in replacement for C++. As Zig is for C.
So when Zig hits 1.0 these companies will probably consider Zig much more than they do today. Understandably.
So what is your point?
> They are now available to tinker with, by constructing one’s application using std.Io.Evented. They should be considered experimental because there is important followup work to be done before they can be used reliably and robustly:
And then they proceed to list 6 important pending work to be done.
and there's even a "hide" link.
One must compare to other models such as Geminis ad GPTs.
And does it block ads on Apple News?
That's because they know that in Apple News+ you are the product and their profit lowers if you block their ads by disabling the app.
People use to say "I feel safe giving an iPhone to grandma because the wallet garden protects her".
Well that argument falls short when Apple allows Taboola of all scam ad networks the be present in their news app.
Or when app store search results is filled with misleading ads.
Taboola is a scammers paradise and I'm surprised Apple touched them with a 10 foot pole even.
there are many reasons to need something like pgbouncer.
1) not all workloads lend themselves to backend pools
2) not all backends can afford pooling
3) you don't always control your backend
4) you might have a lot of different backends connecting to the database. it's much simpler to just tell them to connect to pgbouncer.
5) you don't want to trust backend team to not bring postgresql down with many simultaneolus connections.
6) backend pools often misbehave
people don't wake up one day and just add another cog to their infrastructure randomly.
The problem of resource usage for many connections is real.