I agree with what you say, I just hoped that someone had valiantly spent their time compiling a list of claims by all sides that I could read through, and drill into each one, just to have some perspective, if I ever care to.
259 karma · joined January 27, 2019
I agree with what you say, I just hoped that someone had valiantly spent their time compiling a list of claims by all sides that I could read through, and drill into each one, just to have some perspective, if I ever care to.
I thought we were over this 80 years ago
Any politically neutral registrars that HN crowd can recommend?
I'm living in Russia at present, and the dilemma I face is related to sources of news and information about the ongoing "conflict"/war/invasion.
I could read Russian news, of course, but anyone and their grandmother knows that you get a nice good blob of biased propaganda on those.
I could read European / US news, where the take is quite lopsided as well.
What I actually read is HN, I read some opinions and discussions, looking for ones that are actually interesting and discuss fundamental questions rather than resort to simplifications, logical fallacies, "common sense" (quotes because it tends to be rather private and subjective, but not so common) and then try not to get too much unverified information into my head.
I do not support the war effort, and I sympathize greatly with the many people affected in one way or another by the situation.
Having said all this, is there a good source of [as unbiased as possible] information on the reasons behind the current situation and the sequence of events leading to it? Both sides just sing their tune, vilify the other side and generally try to appeal to subjective morals or feelings or just build a strawman and go from there. Now that's, of course, par for the course, we're talking about media. I, however, would like to know BOTH sides of the conflict deeper before trying to form an opinion that I can count as my own.
Thus, my first question: where do I find some sort of a compilation of arguments from both sides, where everything is not reduced ad absurdum and the opinion is left for the reader to form?
Naturally, I also have a related second question: where would one find a stream of information that's related to the ongoing events (not the history) and portrays the situation from multiple points of view?
As a habit, I try not to hold strong opinions that I don't understand completely, and I most commonly choose not to hold any opinion at all, as I do not find the time investment to sift through all the sources reasonable. Do you have any suggestions, fellow HNers? Or do you just zen out of this and file it away as "life happens, as usual"?
I don't really care much about the state of Russia, and maybe, just maybe the sanctions will have some positive effect; just wanted to say that "most Russians support war" is a very shabby argument in support of approving of punishing "most Russians".
Just let them do it before you taste it, and then pretend you're royalty and thank them for testing it for poison.
When reading the parent comment, I naturally assumed they were talking about sleeping in class, as that wasy solution to the sleep problem as well. To this day I routinely meet people that seem to file this possibility away in the "impossible" drawer of their minds or assume that "this person doesn't look like trash that sleeps during class" and conclude that there's been a misunderstanding.
Just to be clear, I am not lashing out at you (or anyone), and just wanted to make this comment more vivid to emphasize how expectations and assumptions make it all too easy to misinterpret a statement as a "typo" of a different statement altogether.
Of course, this is easier to do in one-on-one setting, and when the whole group wants to spend an hour unrelentingly chatting about shows (when you don't watch any) it's a bit daunting to shift their attention to something else. In such situations I tend to find anything I can relate to and introduce the topic. This could be how their description of a show brings another old one I actually had watched, or maybe chat about how many shows they go through daily, do they find their TV good, how many subscriptions do they have to maintain. Anything goes, in my opinion; heck, even throwing the "I don't watch shows" works (as long as you don't make it sound arrogant / condescending).
In my web app if nothing unexpected happens, only INFO/LOG level stuff is pushed to logs. If, however, I get an exception, I will instead print out all the possible traces. I.e. I always store all the logs in-memory and choose what should be printed out based on the success/failure of the request.
Now, of course, this is just a web API running in AWS Lambda, and I don't have to care overly much about the machine just silently dying mid-request, so this might not work for some of you, but this works great for my use-case and I'm sure it will be enough for a lot of people out there.
Let's check some "principles" posted at https://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html
Our highest priority is to satisfy the customer
through early and continuous delivery
of valuable software.
Welcome changing requirements, even late in
development. Agile processes harness change for
the customer's competitive advantage.
Deliver working software frequently, from a
couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a
preference to the shorter timescale.
Business people and developers must work
together daily throughout the project.
To me it looks like all of the above is screaming at you "quit your great perfect plan and look at the real world instead". If something's wrong, adapt and adjust - this is what agility is about. You can't calcify agility.P.S. not really in any particular argument with you, just that your comment prompted me to write some thoughts that have coagulated in my mind while going through the comments here.
Sometimes I have to do a bit of overtime to fix a time-sensitive issue, and I'm fine with that. The underlying issue, though, might be lack of code review, insufficient testing, fatigue or anything else.
It's good to remember that overtime is a viable solution, but as any solution it has its costs. This can build resentment among employees (making them quit earlier), increase fatigue (this requiring even more overtime to fix issues caused by fatigued employees), build dissatisfaction (resulting in loss of motivation), etc.
In other words, if you're finding yourself plumbing leaks every week, a better solution for the long term might be to replace the whole pipe :)
On the other hand, I feel that most of the lessons I've learnt that have really stuck are the ones where I first do a thing wrong, and then find how to do it right. In a similar fashion, letting the student create a steaming pile of ... and then giving them a solution to their troubles in a later course feels like a good idea.
I personally have come a full circle: starting with things like Pascal and C++, then going to C# and finding type inference interesting, then getting a HUGE boost to my knowledge and skills when I found Python and JS. A few years later, my personal preference is having static type checking, and Typescript does that pretty well, in my opinion. However, every time I remember how much I managed to learn and understand about programming when I switched to Python, I think that if I had to teach someone, I'd pick something expressive, intuitive and who cares about types when you really want to maximize exposure.
To me it seems like some people use the term "credit card" for any bank card, while some actually mean the "credit" part. While "credit" (non-debit) cards don't seem to be THAT popular in the European part of the world, I think that bank cards are pretty much ubiquitous.
1. Open a port on the container for debugging
2. Tell the debugger in the container what's the port it should use (if you're not using the default one)
3. Tell the IDE what port it can use to connect to the debugger (if you're not using the default).
4. Debug it!
For things like Typescript you might need some extra trickery because it's all transpiled, so you'll need to make sure your sourcemaps are set up correctly, but that's not overly difficult.
It did take me several hours to work everything out and write a README so that every time we get a new hire / someone sets up a new PC they can just follow the instructions. I'd say it was time well spent.
I'm using Firefox 68.11 for Android.
> In a 2014 literature review, the American Veterinary Medical Association stated that "controlled studies have not identified this breed group as disproportionately dangerous", and that "it has not been demonstrated that introducing a breed-specific ban will reduce the rate or severity of bite injuries occurring in the community".
> In 2012, the American Bar Association passed a resolution urging the repeal of breed-specific legislation, stating that it is "ineffective at improving public safety".
> In 2013, researchers in Canada found no difference in incidence of dog bites between municipalities with breed-specific legislation and those without it, and in 2008, the Dutch government repealed a 15 year ban on pit bulls, concluding the law was ineffective.
In any case, I'm not sure that having a legislation can be used as a proof of anything. In some countries same-sex sexual activity is illegal and penalized. What does this prove?
It would be great to hear another perspective.