I've never heard that acronym before.
744 karma · joined March 1, 2016
I've never heard that acronym before.
I know about the comparisons to a plane's autopilot, but when driving you don't have the luxury of minutes to react. The name puts an image of confidence in drivers' minds while failing to deliver.
(I don't own a Tesla; I just find they terribly misnamed the feature.)
-- Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2009 edition, section 2A.04, paragraph 01
Replace 'signs' with anything--no one's patience/attention will hold up in the face of a constant barrage of information.
(Mis)quoting Randy Fromm, "the things that work the hardest fail the most."
I've always liked that quote, even though at the time he was referring to CRTs and the color output transistors (well, mostly). It generalizes to most anything electronic.
It's interesting the creativity (like all art) that comes out when limitations and obstacles are met.
Sometimes it feels as though we have only so much for others' plights before we run out and only have enough to focus on our own. I'm not sure.
Good UI design shouldn't be strictly for design's sake, so it can be frustrating when something is difficult to use because 'looking good' was prioritized over usability.
There's a quote I've read here that I like and think is appropriate: "Accessibility is for everybody."
Eye strain and inscrutable UI elements sound like concrete complaints. Whether they were phrased diplomatically, I'm not sure, and I'd concede it might be construed as venting depending on the delivery.
That being said, assuming it was brought up constructively, I see nothing wrong with the criticism except for the specific designers' refusal to consider it.
But yes, an absolute gem and a nice little snapshot in time.
That's a shame about the lawsuits. I'm only bringing up (not blaming at all!) lawyers since it's the example you gave, but thinking about it, I think a sue-happy culture is just one of the symptoms or maybe foreshadowing our slow descent into not assuming good faith on the part of others or trying to lift everyone up rather than extract as much as you can from everyone else. It's as though we've moved from cooperation to being adversarial (in very general terms.)
I suppose that might be why that employee handbook attracts me so much--the contrast between their relationship with their employees is stark against what we seem to have today. Like before, it's a relationship of mutual benefit vs. the asymmetry between employers/employees we have now.
I'm awful with words and getting my ideas out, and I reiterate that I've nothing against law as a profession. It just serves as a nice exemplar.
RIP:
- Hewlett-Packard (err...Agilent, I mean Keysight)
- Tektronics
- IBM Thinkpads
- Screws and modular assemblies
and the declined quality that nearly brings a tear to my eye of:
- Craftsman (the real Craftsman)
- the manufacturer of my old clothes dryer with a schematic of the whole thing taped to the inside of the front panel (at least my new one has WiFi and NFC!)
You can certainly accuse me of rose-tinted glasses, and I probably shouldn't even have nostalgia for a company, but it does really just make me a little sad. Just look at Tek's old employee handbook: https://vintagetek.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/EmployeeHa...
Signed,
A life-long tinkerer
I'm already skeptical of the overall impact of recycling in general; I feel as though it makes people feel like they're helping the environment while turning attention away from the mass polluters. I'm definitely cynical, but I'd really like to be proven wrong on that last point.
Maybe something like emacs, but AMP-based, and we'll have the worst of two worlds!
On an unrelated note, we thank our sponsors and benefactors for bringing us drafts and notes we occasionally might use to augment our impeccable news coverage.
I recognize a fellow BOFH...
> hat-makers
Surely you mean haberdashers--they're ground floor! (Thank you, Coil, for Going Up.)
I'm sorry if this might be common knowledge, but I've honestly never heard this and can't understand it.
Is it saying that it's better to do something than to (formally) prove it, like the opposite of (I think) Knuth's famous quote?
...is how a little-known Google employee named Sundar Pichai rose to fame in the company by bundling Chrome.