1,249 karma · joined August 14, 2015
personal website: https://hyperknot.com/
email: zsolt@maphub.net
If you are interested in what 1/100th of AWS price looks, have a look at Online's server order page for example [1].
Also, Discourse.org's default setup is PostgreSQL hosted in a Docker container, it also has probably 1-10 thousand live forums and is a reliable platform.
Now that file just loves growing to 40 GB+ and there is no supported way to reclaim that space.
You can delete the file (or click Reset to factory defaults in the GUI), but then you loose all your Docker's storage, like data volumes.
I don't know of any such adapter. Do they exist? The Apple one allows you to use TB2 devices with your new TB3 laptop, not the other way.
There is also a GitHub comparison for all object storage providers (this price reduction isn't included yet as I see) [2].
[1] https://www.ovh.com/us/cloud/storage/object-storage.xml [2] http://gaul.org/object-store-comparison/
They just raised $8M Series A on March, 2016 [1], and their business modell is basically about trying to serve you those crowdsourced photos made by volunteeers.
Like $249 / month if you are trying to use those images in your map [2].
There is nothing wrong with that, but I believe it's the opposite of "available for all" and "open repository of photos", as you've quoted as well.
[1] https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/mapillary#/entity [2] https://www.mapillary.com/solutions
There is one critical issue which needs to be solved though, Mapbox reached out to them and asked them to rebuild everything from scratch [2], which means that it'll be a few more months before it's legally "safe" to use vector tiles produced by this project.
(disc: I'm just a user)
[1] http://osm2vectortiles.org/ [2] https://github.com/osm2vectortiles/osm2vectortiles/issues/38...
Yet, even for a simple embed on a website, you have to pay them $99 / month. Using the images for custom maps: $249 / month.
Accessing the data is not publicly available, but is probably in the range of enterprise pricing options, only listed as "Contact Us". To me this seems to be the opposite of the OSM model and there is a huge need for a OSV like platform.
If 47% of all CloudFlare users are not connecting via HTTP/2 (even though it is supported server side), I believe it means that those users do not have client side support (or are behind a proxy, etc. which doesn't allow it).
At the end, if someone is thinking about making a website which would be much slower for non-HTTP/2 users then right now it means around 47% of their users.
[1] https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflares-impact-on-the-http-2...