iandanforth

I recommend clicking around on genres for languages you don't speak. The songs sound great as long as you don't know what they are saying. Lyrics are still a very weak point for AI music, still, infinite enjoyment as long as you're ignorant of the flaws!

This should be titled, "I Tried Windows Gaming on a Mac and With a Lot of Effort It's Passable!"

For some perspective we have not yet scaled robot training. The amount of data that Pi is using to train their impressively capable robots is in the range of thousands of hours of data. In contrast language models are trained over trillions of tokens comprising the entirety of human knowledge. So if you're saying things like "this still seems hard" just remember we have yet to hit this with the data hammer. Simulation is proving a great way to augment / bootstrap robot dexterity but it still pales in comparison to data in the real world. So, as the author points out, we may get capability scaling like Waymo where one company painstakingly collects real data over a decade, but we may also see the rapid progress in simulators and simulator speed overtake for practical household / industrial tasks. My bet is on the latter.

For those who don't bother to click through profiles, Jeff really knows what he's talking about. Much of Meta/FAIR + community benefits from his code.

Sandwich code review is what HN is for.

Soon.

Have you tried? It works well for other books, e.g. here's a scene from "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" which is conveniently in the public domain.

https://chatgpt.com/share/67f5d652-f7f4-8013-b2f2-3c997ea513...

Fwiw pixlr is a good pairing with GPT 4o for just this. Generate with 4o then use pixlr AI tools to edit bits. Especially for removals pixlr (and I'm sure others) are much much faster and quite reliable.

First clue of "Professional Sports Teams" and I noped right out. Sportsball is a pretty big red flag that the content presented is not for me.

Good, I'm strongly against supernatural beliefs and any trend towards greater secular thought is a welcome one.

I'd very much like to see VLAs get in the game with ARC. When I solve these puzzles I'm imagining myself move blocks around. Much of the time I'm treating these as physics simulations with custom physics per puzzle. VLAs are particularly well suited to the kind of training and planning which might unlock solutions here.

So, fairly accurate if you're Chinese?

Regardless of material, these examples are hideous.

Summon Elisabeth Bik! (I want to know what she thinks)

Can he turn around when you scroll back up?

Doesn't work?

`Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: 'microphone' (value of 'name' member of PermissionDescriptor) is not a valid value for enumeration PermissionName.`

WARNING: Pasting in a Zillow link will immediately try to log you in via an oath provider.

This is a seriously sketchy UX pattern, I advise avoiding this website.

I'll share my recipe for using these products on the off chance it helps someone.

1. Only do searches that result in easily verifiable results from non-AI sources.

2. Always perform the search in multiple products (Gemini 1.5 Deep Research, Gemini 2.0 Pro, ChatGPT o3-mini-high, Claude 3.7 w/ extended thinking, Perplexity)

With these two rules I have found the current round of LLMs useful for "researchy" queries. Collecting the results across tools and then throwing out the 65-75% slop results in genuinely useful information that would have taken me much longer to find.

Now the above could be seen as a harsh critique of these tools, as in the kiddie pool is great as long as you're wearing full hazmat gear, but I still derive regular and increasing value from them.

> Hacker News: You'll write a comment so perfectly balanced between technical insight and dry humor that it breaks the upvote system, forcing dang to implement a new 'slow clap' feature just for you.

fist pump

While there's a large audience for Jerry Springer style content, verbal abuse and stooping to the level of someone you're criticizing are not required. I don't read HN for name calling or childish taunting. It is always dispiriting to read, and even more so to read people defending. Humans, as you note, have base instincts, but giving into them and catering to them should be left to X and other sites devoted to pandering.

The tone of the article is unprofessional to say the least. You could remove the argumentative tone, vitriol, and insults and have a more impactful article that reflected well on the author while appropriately warning people against this company. Please, don't choose team troll.

That press release is written in the most servile fashion. Delete "carefully", "respectfully", "authentically", etc you get the exact same content except it doesn't sound boot-licking. I'm all for getting a culture right, but the proof is in the product, not in easy to type adjectives that describe how you should always act without expecting praise for it.

For introductory articles like this I also find it helpful to know that the whole positive / negative thing is arbitrary. In fact the assignment of "negative" to electrons arise due to a mistaken interpretation by Benjamin Franklin of one of his experiments. So if you're wondering why gaining the primary mobile charge carrier makes things more negative blame Ben Franklin!

Your machine has jammed, doesn't work in Firefox (macos). The words dropdown doesn't populate, nor does the style dropdown. I see a JSON.parse uncaught SyntaxError.

Got an error (literally just said "Error") trying to sign up for the waitlist, FF mobile on Android.

Since this seems to be a love fest let me offer a contrarian view. I use conda for environment management and pip for package management. This neatly separates the concerns into two tools that are good at what they do. I'm afraid that uv is another round of "Let's fix everything" just to create another soon to be dead set of patterns. I find nothing innovative or pleasing in its design, nor do I feel that it is particularly intuitive or usable.

You don't have to love uv, and there are plenty of reasons not to.

This is a very interesting business. Simple and appealing to a general user but apparently worth $1k/m for business users who want access to consolidated data via API.

I'm sure there's a host of businesses like this, but I don't know who the customer base is. $1k/m seems to be a lot, but I don't have a need!

Perhaps you can enlighten us as to why this isn't a good use case for an LLM during a deep research workflow.

Your product launch video deserves more than an "um" filled single take.

We see your American Psycho reference and are pleased.