I first did it with inscape and the file size of the simple logo I was editing went up by 6x due to the inscape metadata so I did it manually.
370 karma · joined August 3, 2015
I first did it with inscape and the file size of the simple logo I was editing went up by 6x due to the inscape metadata so I did it manually.
It's becoming pretty common to know a few amateur DJs / music creators and if you have some decent speakers they happily mix for a part of the night. When they're done it's back to DJ ipod.
There is also plenty of raves where I live. I feel the atmosphere is much more enjoyable there than in night clubs
That's how I see systemd and wayland. For systemd the consensus seems to be that's it's better than the previous init systems as most distributions have adopted it. It seems we're going in that direction with wayland but we'll see how it goes.
I don't know how much spam come from cheap hosting services but between the hacked servers and servers rented by spammers it's probably a lot.
Just to nitpick, your point absolutely stands
We could decide that lockdowns / restrictions are not good but then we also have to be okay with letting lot of people die gasping for air and drowning in their own lungs at home / in the hospital corridors. As much as I hate not being able to socialize how I like I still prefer that and it seem to also be the case for most of the population.
I have no idea if we'll ever be able to eradicate the Covid but if we don't it might become just an other flu when enough people are vaccinated or had it.
Mine gives one public ipv4 per device that access the internet on the network (with some exceptions). Strategies varies but if you have a lot of addresses why not use them.
The navigation bar on the bottom is an interesting expiriment but still I quickly moved it back up.
The new tab layout is worse. Each tab need much more space so you can display about half the number of tabs on the same space.
The top sites when you opened a new tab also disappeared. It seems you can put bookmark or something to replace them but the top site feature was really good. I'm likely to want to visit sites I visit the most and that used to be a touch away
It mostly because the high pressure pump use the Diesel for lubrication so if you use something else the pump destroy itself sending tiny metal shards down the pipe and into the injectors.
That's why accidentally running a diesel car on gas turn expensive fast. The contrary is much cheaper as just have to flush the fuel lines and you're good to go.
I made the terrible mistake of jumping too far between versions and the update broke iDrac and thus the server. There was no warning on Dell's website nor any when I applied the update. I only found out what happened after some googling where I found the upgrade path I should have taken.
This is just terrible quality control and software engineering.
Long story short it took me a week (try something, test it a bit, send it to a larger group of people and fix what broke) and email clients are stuck in the distant past. You have to use fixed-width tables to embed images (but also define the image width in the image tag ! Some clients ignore one or the other), you also have to use tables for layout and style inheritance doesn't really work because clients override styles. The only way to get consistent layout is to embed text in <span> and repeat the styling everywhere.
I also coded something to auto-generate the signature using data from the company intranet and I discovered that when you copy paste HTML code the browser will only copy HTML/CSS code that's actually rendered (you can fix that using draft APIs) but you still have the same problem when pasting the signature in the signature form (roundcube in our case) some duplicates attributes that the browser skip are actually useful for broken mail clients.
I finally got it working but I'd really wish mail clients would use modern web engines. All major mail clients come from organization that also make browsers. I doesn't have to be that painful
Edit: thanks to those who suggested tools to help with that ! It took so long because I was just telling myself, it can't be that broken. Just try that and it should work. I'll definitely try them if I ever have to write email HTML again
I'd also say that great social skills are just as important today. Society is not meritocratic, you can have best idea, the best solution to a problem if you can't sell it or react appropriately to criticism (even to you coworkers) you're going to be frustrated. I'd that sometimes include being "cunning" if the person you're talking to is not being honest you don't have to be either.
Maybe they can't do anything about it. I admit my knowledge of finance is limited. I've read about the SEC doing investigations after Elon Musk tweet for example.
Do we know what really went wrong at Intel ? I know they made a big bet on a technology that didn't pay off. Is it that they just had no competition for years and became complacent ?
I also wonder how much TSMC will ask Intel to split the company to ensure that their process does not leak to the Intel side. There is probably lots of interesting details about what works you can obtain if you work closely with TSMC engineers.
Each user can also have many alternative addresses that map to an unique mailbox
Those mailings lists are used a lot internally and managed with internally developed tools. This make migrating to an external service difficult.
That's the classic example of some critical piece of infrastructure that nobody dare to touch because it works... until it doesn't anymore.
That's why we don't use external services to receive email. I'll consider using mailJet if setting up exim & related stuff correctly to send email in 2020 proves too painful.
In my organization we have ~10 linux VM and they are all configured to send email to an exim MTA. For example monitoring stuff. The system mail name is set to vmName.srv.domain.name (domain.name is replaced by our actual domain and this resolve to a local address) so it's quite common to receive mail from root@vmName.srv.domain.name. This cause no issue when it's delivered to the local Cyrus server but when it's transfered to a Gmail address for some reason Gmail reject the email because the headers are bad.
I am considering rewriting the address to user.vmName.srv@domain.name in exim when receiving email from local VMs and I am wondering if this could be a bad idea.
I'm going to redo this mail server from scratch soon because it has been left untouched for something like 6 years. Some software was compiled on it with shared libraries which then were updated but the software was not recompiled. It's a dumpster fire and I'm actually surprised most of our emails seem to go through.
I would also add to the article that's it's a good idea to have some rate limit on outbound email, outbound email spam checks and to check that the user sending email has the right to use that address.
I'm the sysadmin for a small nonprofit so my organization qualify for the $3500 yearly azure credits but the inability to set spending limits makes me not use azure. If I make a mistake or worse an admin account is compromised the azure bill is potentially infinite.
With azure I think you can mitigate the issue somewhat by having a superAdmin account without limits and set quotas for everything else but I still don't feel at ease with that.
My organization is a music festival so the infrastructure really has to work and not stop one day per year. I can keep an eye on everything during the festival and monitor spending. If things stop not during the festival people are a bit annoyed until I can look into the issue but nothing bad happens.
In a perfect world I'd like to have a way to setup a limit where you need to go through support to increase it. I'd really pay for that. I think it's really too easy to receive a nasty surprise bill.
The slides came out in 2014 so the API / ABI thing was probably true then but not anymore.
Maybe things would have been different if LibreSSL was backed by a major Linux distribution and OpenBSD. Even then Unix/Linux is not the only target of a lot of software and I doubt a lot of developer would have put the time to support both.
[Edit] I just saw in an other comment that LibreSSL is used in MacOSX and windows for openSSH. Maybe developers will consider it if it becomes available on major platforms
A lot of that uglyness seems to come from the fact that OpenSSL wants to support all environments (even DOS). I wonder why distributions haven't switched since LibreSSL was made to be API/ABI compatible with openSSL and target a POSIX OS. This would be much more justified than the ffmepg / libav thing imo.
Looking up on Wikipedia it seems that LibreSSL is focused on OpenBSD and removed lots of legacy code. BoringSSL (Google) got renamed to Tink but I couldn't not find much more.
It's sad to see that duplication of effort but it's also the force of open source
It's probably pretty invisible for the developer if he has the "firmware creation pipeline" working on his machine but that's layer over layers of legacy stuff and the added complexity probably led to some nasty bugs.