ni://example.com/sha-256;f4OxZX_x_FO5LcGBSKHWXfwtSx-j1ncoSt3SABJtkGk
( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-decade-ni-10#secti... )
229 karma · joined December 14, 2011
ni://example.com/sha-256;f4OxZX_x_FO5LcGBSKHWXfwtSx-j1ncoSt3SABJtkGk
( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-decade-ni-10#secti... )
Otherwise it doesn't reload everything. Verify this by watching the Developer Console's Network section. I can only assume this is intentional; my coworkers told me this trick last year and it still seems to be the case.
Google, Archive.org, and my best attempt at HNSearch API ( http://api.thriftdb.com/api.hnsearch.com/items?id=2534649... ) didn't tell me what was in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2534649 either.
We're only just now reaching the point where I can count on my friends having 64-bit CPUs.
Intel's first 64-bit mobile processor was released in mid-2006. That is only six years ago. The manufacturing transition itself was pretty quick - only a year or two until all their currently-manufactured CPUs were 64-bit [AFAIK], if we ignore Atom. Many of my friends have 6-7 year old laptops because they still work and that's all they need.
64-bit was chiefly engineering work: the CPUs didn't cost more to make because of Moore's law [I believe]. I hope that Retina screens are similarly not-more-expensive when made in large quantities. But what if they are a bit more expensive? We'll be cursed with budget 72/96 screens for maybe five more years on top of the length of time people keep their devices!
And it really will be a curse to us, personally, web designers. The Web uses images, and everyone uses the Web.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_64#Intel_64_implementation...
[Disclaimer: I am writing a science game that uses lots of 64-bit integers, so it runs noticably faster when compiled for x86_64 than for x86.]
(well, I did because I participated in GSoC, and they needed my address to pay me, which I decided was worth it for me! Etc. etc.)
Also, I/we needn't have just one fundamental motivation. I would also kind of die if my sense of curiosity was taken away from me. That doesn't make me better or worse than uncurious people, just different.
Unlike Ars, this has the information you need. Each server that implements this TACK draft has a TACK key at any given time, as well as their usual TLS key. Conforming clients get sorta-ssh-like key security:
"3.2. Pin life cycle
A TACK client maintains a store of pins for verifying TLS connections. Pins associate a hostname and a TACK key. When a client sees a new hostname and TACK key combination, an inactive pin is created. Every subsequent time the client sees the same pin, the pin is "activated" for a period equal to the timespan between the first time the pin was seen and the most recent time, up to a maximum period of 30 days."
Lexically scoped closures are from Scheme* and virtually all modern languages have them now. (Well, C++ and Java are late on the lambda boat, but C++11 and it seems Java 8 are getting them.) That's a huge influence.
* Scheme was the first Lisp to gain lexical scope, and C of course has lexical scope but not closures, but what's the full history here? It's also part of the lambda calculus.
Hmm, that is wrong enough that I'll call them out by name... https://www.nbotickets.com/ (Is it polite and useful to email them how I feel about that? I feel like I'd just be "someone-is-wrong-on-the-internet"-ing. Advice?)
Some of the comments on that article suggest running your own OpenVPN instance on Amazon EC2 or other VPS. If the EC2 suggestion works, it looks reasonably priced (at least as long as you don't use it all day every day).
For example, to do a 32 bit add of 0x12345678 and 0xaabbccdd, do this:
SET [0x1000], 0x5678 ; low word
SET [0x1001], 0x1234 ; high word
suggests he's thinking in little-endian.I don't think it's relevant to this spec though: there's no way for a DCPU program to detect the CPU's endianness. Imagine it's C with 16-bit "char"s and no larger int sizes.
I also found a ring sizing guide: http://pages.ebay.com/buy/guides/ring-sizing-guide/
It helps me be in touch with my emotions/body/appetite etc. Even when they're unwell. I would otherwise shy away from acknowledging/considering/contemplating things I don't like. Sometimes this helps me when I feel overcome with guilt (for me I usually feel guilty about minor things that I only feel guilty about because I'm a perfectionist who is appalled by hurting a metaphorical flea. Or, regrets.).
If other people know other kinds of meditation better, I'd love to hear about them too.