5,564 karma · joined November 19, 2010
I would sooner die for my family and my country but I wouldn't lift a finger to save the lives of refugees/immigrants.
It looks verbose but it defines the requirements based on your input, and when you approve it then it defines a design, and (again) when you approve it then it defines an implementation plan (a series of tasks.)
And the experience will be just as user-hostile with no end in sight.
* Engineers are consulted for estimates to facilitate long-term planning
* Middle management slashes those estimates in half due to pathological myopia
* Executives enforce musical chairs to assert their authority
* Consultants muck everything up while collecting enormous payouts
And yet the business cycle keeps cycling.
It is the same reason every app (be they web or mobile) gets a redesign every year.
There is real data used for insurance premiums and claims payouts but it's being swapped out for AI slop, and the sales folks are getting bonuses for selling hot garbage and the executives are getting bonuses for buying hot garbage.
When your bus is 30 minutes late for weeks, months, and years on end, you will look into getting a car.
When there are homeless people sleeping on buses, you will look into getting a car.
When there are mentally ill people threatening other passengers on buses, you will look into getting a car.
When there are drug addicts smoking weed or meth on buses, you will look into getting a car.
When there are sociopaths listening to music on their speakerphone or otherwise being very loud on buses every day, you will look into getting a car.
When you are assaulted or robbed at bus or metro stations, you will look into getting a car.
etc etc etc
It's not complicated.
This is why streaming is so expensive.
One could argue it is necessary but it is undeniable that it is not effective -- nuclear power plants take decades to bring online and then they may never see break-even. Not only that but they require vast sums of water for the entire lifetime of the nuclear plant (which is fast becoming a scarcity, if not because of increased consumption but also because of changing water availability.)
On the other hand, renewable (wind and solar) can be brought up MW by MW, on a much faster timescale, privately funded (all nuclear is publicly funded now), and it has much better unit economics even without subsidies. Renewable energy is here to stay, it is going to become more abundant, and it is going to become more reliable with each passing year.
Nuclear is as unreliable as ever, even after 70 years of modernization, the economics of scale, and unlimited access to the public purse.
Reducing actual demand for PG&E electricity is not in the best interest of regulators, that much is clear.
[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-says-wistron-on-probat...