imcritic

I hate such poor docs that don't explain how things work, and instead prefer hiding behind some "magic".

> Constraints can be added to the requested dependency if specific versions are needed:

> uv run --with 'rich>12,<13' example.py

Why not mention that this will make uv download specified versions of specified packages somewhere on the disk. Where? Are those packages going to get cached somewhere? Or will it re-download those same packages again and again every time you run this command?

You split your config across multiple files. That slows startup noticeably.

What a boringly long article.

I don't really see any value in such combines.

You want some calculation? Run calc and do the calculation, do you save so much time by replacing the "run calc" step with "open launcher" that it's worth adding more software to your setup?

Wouldn't sites be able to detect presence of scripts injected by your extension (to, say, refuse you services since site owner decided they would like their site to be used only by humans, not AI agents)?

Why such a rude name "BitchAt"? At what?

> Why Use Juvio?

> No additional lock or requirements files are needed

Additional to what?

> Guaranteed reproducibility

Of what?

I probably need your project, but I don't understand what it is for.

This article doesn't explain the benefits of the suggested approach well enough.

And the last example looks like a poor advice and contradicts previous advice: there's rarely a global condition that is enough to check once at the top: the condition usually is inside the walrus. And why do for walrus in pack {walrus.throbnicate()} instead of making throbnicate a function accepting the whole pack?

Farming? This will be used in warfare.

You keep repeating the name wrong: yololand, not yololand.

www.science.org Verifying you are human. This may take a few seconds.

www.science.org needs to review the security of your connection before proceeding.

Sorry, you have been blocked You are unable to access stratolaunch.com Why have I been blocked? This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

What can I do to resolve this? You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page.

When I see an argument with a phrase like "basic premise" I know I'm reading some word mambo jambo, otherwise the author would just give their summary of that "basic premise" instead of deadlinking it (refer to something without actually referring it).

You don't have an argument yourself, you just wanted to share that you are pro some position.

How do those background images scale on different monitors/resolutions?

Btw, how does grub figure out in what resolution to draw the interface?

Same problem with Google's captchas: solving them doesn't always mean you will be let in. That's outrageous, like isn't that the whole point?

Too many sites that used to be good installed that shit. And weird part is that on desktop only Chromium fails to pass the captcha, no issues on Firefox. But Chromium is my main browser and sometimes I'm too lazy/uncomfortable opening 2nd browser for those sites.

For me the biggest issue with archwiki adding Anubis is that it doesn't let me in when I open it on mobile. I am using Cromite: it doesn't support extensions, but has some ABP integrated in.

I think the idea is poor: giving some answer is making a choice. I'd rather keep the site thinking I'm still choosing what to pick and have adblocker hide the crap.

Nice idea, but this project is currently written in Typescript, so I view it as a prototype at best.

Browser history gets rotated. I've lost a beautiful song that way, forgetting to like/bookmark it properly, thinking I'd just find it in history...

Poor UI, judging by the screenshots on that page. Another piece of software that treats users as imbeciles in dire need of being saved from "clutter".

Since we are dreaming - add ETL there as well!

This doesn't answer my question in the slightest. What does it offer so nice that vscodium doesn't have and that would push me to switch to theia?

Why would I switch from vscodium to theia?

Still depends on what the data represent: you could get yourself in a storm of phone calls from customers if after your latest release there's now a weird note saying their saved document was last updated today.

"HOW DARE YOU MODIFY MY DOCUMENTS WITHOUT MY..."

Always soft-deletion first. Then it gets exported to a separate archive and only then, after some time and may be attempted to be fully deleted from the initial base.

Maybe this could become a solution to the shitshow of a problem with Android APIs that make it impossible for any music player app to let user delete locally saved music files?

Isn't this stupid?

Why not flush something properly in the RAM instead to wipe the "cached" secrets?

A full restart feels like an overkill.

They were probably joking when they asked that question.

Your reply doesn't seem sarcastic, so I take it you genuinely r/whoosh'ed (that's a reference to a subreddit about situations where someone is acting clueless).

It's rather "I know I'm rich, but why do friends expect ME to pay for dinner all the time? It's so unfair!".