448 karma · joined April 25, 2026
I'm not sure this is helping your argument. Why are some entities given the benefit of the doubt, while most individuals are not?
This rules out the use of dash cams then.. but I'm sure you realize the public benefit those offer, so I'm reluctant to accept this argument.
From my vantage, this appears to be a "rules for thee but not for me" situation. If you support filming in public spaces, but believe restricting that to only those you trust, then this is hypocrisy.
> everyone should be taxed the same
Ireland, as a sovereign nation, gets to decide their own tax policy.
None of this is theft, you're just maligning Ireland for their choice of tax policy, something they're entirely within their rights to decide without external influence.
I think we're at an impasse.
Ireland isn't stealing from other people by changing their tax policies to attract business, that isn't theft by any stretch of the imagination outside of a libertarian one that posits all taxation is theft.. and you haven't answered my question: Why should Ireland change their tax policy to benefit other (much larger) governments?
It's fairly insulting that you've described the Irish as thieves, something Europeans have done for centuries, just because you want more tax revenue for other, much larger, governments.
> it is estimated that in 2024, of the order of ~€104bn in annual GVA, 876,000 jobs and €14.6bn in annual employment related tax was enabled by the availability of digital infrastructure provided by data centres located in Ireland.
Seems like the economics of hosting these data centers benefits Ireland substantially, even with their tax breaks.
what is the alternative? I don't think self hosting is a robust/defensible option for a majority of internet services
This is "incredibly aggressive, hostile, and rude, of out nowhere". Please leave me alone, I have nothing else to say to people like you.
For anyone else, imagine a winemaker that cares about their end product more than they care about growing grapes.. does that mean this winemaker doesn't care about the quality of their grapes? Probably not, but apparently to this individual the english language requires that we believe the winemaker to be disingenuous if they clarify their position on grape quality.
do not drink water, fish fuck in it.
sincerely,
fatty arbuckle
We had someone collapse on campus and have a seizure. An entire group of people stood around this person as they wet themselves, nobody doing anything but watching. I picked out specific people from the group to help, told them what to do, and told everyone else to back away. There was even some guy who got pissed at me for telling him to leave the area, but he's exactly the kind of person you want out of the way.
Lesson here, be specific, be aggressive, and take charge when it's needed, because it's very unlikely that a bystander will do anything but watch.
This is dishonest. Your quip was to imply that I'm reducing what is otherwise a fun activity to an automation, on the basis of a purity test.
> Some people merely enjoy programming more than engineering.
And I haven't said otherwise, so I'm not sure what point youre trying to make. My initial goal was to provide my own viewpoint on how to enjoy the process while taking advantage of modern tools, not to tell people they shouldn't enjoy programming more than engineering.
then so is your opinion on the matter. this goes both ways. I can just as easily dismiss your commentary as "drive-by".
> Not really a statement of your drive, is it? More of a directive or suggestion.
Yeah, so was my initial comment. Merely a suggestion concerning view points, and how a shift in that can bring back some amount of joy.
You don't have the moral high ground here.
Why should I regret that? Why should I care about your purity tests?