2,504 karma · joined August 22, 2008
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/mattmichie; my proof: https://keybase.io/mattmichie/sigs/Wqazx9omfu-xkcDMYubJrvDDDZ-O4i4b9ZvkqZ8sHYI ]
Instead, we're still forcing students into rigid cohorts based mainly on age, effectively optimizing for the statistical mean while leaving both ends of the ability distribution poorly served. This is particularly wasteful with gifted students who could be advancing much faster if the system accommodated their pace of learning.
The tech to deliver adaptive education at scale exists today. The main barriers are institutional inertia and perhaps a misguided egalitarian impulse that confuses equality of opportunity with enforced uniformity of outcomes. We should embrace the natural variation in human capabilities and build systems that help each student reach their potential, rather than constraining everyone to march in lockstep.
function HALT(program, input):
# This is a "magic" function for our proof - we assume it exists for all programs
# In reality, this function cannot exist because of the paradox we're about to create
# Returns True if `program(input)` halts, False if it runs forever
...
# Program D: Creates the paradox
function D(self):
if HALT(D, self) == True:
loop_forever()
else:
halt()Take Cliff Mass - he's a professor of Atmospheric Sciences at UW whose research focuses on weather modeling, climate systems, and atmospheric dynamics. When someone with his expertise raises questions about climate science conclusions, should we approach this differently than when non-experts do so?
This raises an interesting question about the role of expertise and scientific discourse: Is there a meaningful distinction between how we treat challenges to consensus from qualified researchers in the field versus those from outside it? Or should acceptance of consensus apply equally regardless of one's credentials?
A society that fails to address stealing is like an organism unable to fight off a parasite. It may function for a while, but the harm eventually becomes too great. This is why well-designed disincentives for antisocial behavior are crucial for maintaining long-term societal health.