699 karma · joined June 22, 2018
It only gets very complicated when you start forwarding that data to 3rd parties, intensively tracking + storing user behaviour and engineering patterns aimed at deceiving how you use the data.
If you're that worried about keeping up to date on these types of rules, you can subscribe to the EU data protection newsletter, which will be a fairly decent overview on what's going on: https://edps.europa.eu/press-publications/publications/newsl...
It won't give me 4 hours a week back, because my boss still reserves my time for those 4 hours.
My household won't have an extra 30 euro a month to spend on those dinners. actually it will directly have 30 euro less to spend on dinners. so yeah all those considerations make me cautious paying for more subscriptions.
With smaller companies/startups >60 people, a better signifier is very little glassdoor activity. Someone who works in a healthy workplace with fair, well paying salaries has no reason to ever even open that dumpster fire of a website.
Also I wouldn’t be surprised if a terms like housing stress based on the 30% rule is part of official terminology. So it can be used for discussing rental rates, morgage prices and legislation.
Looking at averages like you propose isn’t useful if something bad impacts a whole population.
It’s similar to the fact that giving homeless people a place to live for free is cheaper than continually kicking them on the streets
Unions often slow down change, in bad times this means more job security and protections. In good times they might act slower.
Aka more rich people are the target in SF compared to other cities where mostly lower class people are effected?
In my experience updates to smaller services are often trivial, or for updates that are actually impactful it would be way easier to coordinate in a monolithic codebase.