Perplexity more and more looks like an overestimated Yahoo or AOL. Tons of ads and clutter, and a questionable product strategy. How you gonna build dashboards when the LLMs' accuracy isn't guaranteed? It requires the same time investment as building it from scratch bc of all the double-checking of your data after the LLM vibe coded smth
TL;DR sounds somewhat cool, not sure if usable in real life
No offense, but I consider AI unsuitable for marketing purposes. Coding with AI assistants is great but the texts... it's always average. No one wants to see the dull, lifeless average content. Some of your tools like user persona, SWOT, keywords look neat, though! Good luck
Sounds nice! Especially with the Sakana's latest development of Continuous Thought Machine. The next step should be to let foundation models fine-tune themselves based on their 'history of what has been tried before' and new data
From my point of view, on paper, Lottie seems like the perfect bridge between designers and devs, but once you start poking under the hood, the trade-offs pile up fast
I think my point was more that if your vision diverges heavily from the "normal" flow of those engines, sometimes it's just less friction to build your own
It's refreshing to see someone advocate for small, custom tooling not from a "purist”"standpoint but because it's actually fun and practical for their workflow
Not only would it be insanely cool, it'd give us a once-in-a-lifetime chance to study something that might've formed in the first moments of the universe
A golf ball–sized primordial black hole lurking in the outer solar system sounds like pure sci-fi, but it would neatly explain the gravitational weirdness and the lack of visual detection
Most people have at least a vague sense of Pluto being the edge of the solar system, so hearing that Planet Nine could be way beyond that makes it feel almost interstellar
A good reminder that we're allowed to value our time and expertise, especially when dealing with companies that can pay but often hope you'll give it away for free in the name of "collaboration."
I probably worded that clumsily. You're right that personal risk is a big part of why doctors recommend vaccines. I was trying to emphasize that even when individual risk feels low, there's still a strong public health case for broad vaccination. Both angles matter, and ideally they work hand in hand.
Yeah, the whole HPV testing landscape is kind of a mess - lots of "maybe, sort of, probably" vibes even after paying out of pocket for extra tests. It's frustrating how unclear everything still is, especially for something so common.
Targeting the mouth - where a lot of these viruses actually spread from - seems like such an obvious approach I'm honestly surprised we don't already have something like this in common use
But I think part of the article's point is less about banning all forms of spreading the word and more about dismantling the surveillance-driven, hyper-targeted ad economy that's become the default.