2,300 karma · joined February 9, 2011
To be more specific, I counted 882 possible words in the worst case using ARISE, versus 697 using SERAI.
If your goal is to minimize the number of remaining words in the worst case, I think SERAI is the winner, leaving you with at most 697 choices. [Assuming my code is right]
If these vehicles are in high demand, to prevent scalping? The length of the restriction ("no resale for one year") seems aligned with that goal.
Not at all skeptical, just looking for an accessible intro to GoRuck.
I get that those 150 lives were all at risk, because a not-too-bright someone wanted them killed, but... I'm also curious how many of those would manage to kill their targets if they weren't intercepted?
This isn't an argument against intervention, since they demonstrated an intent to kill. But I'm legitimately wondering how often people with grudges connect with actual contract killers.
If you put something on Twitter mentioning certain cryptocurrency keywords (e.g. MetaMask), you'll get reply tweets from bots in a few seconds with fake support documents hosted on Google drive.
My sense is that this is what they are trying to stop.
On a web page, I tend to scroll using a single finger or knuckle on the arrow keys. Requiring a mouse at that point (or extra keypresses, if those even work) breaks the reading experience.
If this is a castle, it's not a very inviting one.
I realize the conversion rate could be lower, but why not put this CTA in a non-pop-up form at the end of the article? If I really enjoyed it, that seems like the point where I'd be on board with signing up.
When I first saw "Object" in the summary, I didn't know what it meant.
I realize this may sound like a weird question, but I'm curious if there had ever been mistakes like this, with a lack of protection leading to actual accidental extinction.
It's very important to realize that it's not a safe object, the kind you might leave on your desk at work.
If someone tries to pick it up for some reason, it's quite likely that they'll drop it.
Whenever someone tells you about All the Crime They Are Doing, I think you should assume that you are dealing with an actual cop, stop doing business with them, and cut off all contact.
[1] https://www.wired.com/2013/03/alfred-anaya/ [2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/indiana-man-accused-of-...
I can understand when someone refuses to address butchery with a polite and artful response.
The article mentions a boundary condition ("_share_price > 0"), not an off-by-one error.
Is it returned to the company, or does the DoJ keep it as an asset forfeiture?
All the hypothetical examples are realistic, but... what are the names of companies that are actually providing that level of data about me?
The obvious implication is that drug dealers are low-status individuals who deserve this kind of treatment.