HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

irrationaljared

225 karma · joined February 18, 2011

http://about.me/jaredcosulich
submissionscomments
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Ha yes, I was too lazy to put in 2013 and then change it in a month :)
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Yes, that's true. It's not particularly secure. I don't think many people are going to try and gain brute force to a random photo album, especially considering 80% are blank with people just trying out the site..
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Good to know. Out of curiosity (and excuse my naivety if this should be obvious), but why is https so important to you in this situation?
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Thanks for the feedback. All of the example photos are my own, but I can try to make it look a little less stock-photoish.

Good point about the privacy terms. I have examples from my other websites that I'll throw up there.

irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Thank you for that feedback. I'll play around with some different ways of showing the collaboration option.

I was just making some changes to the site to fix a bug and introduced another bug :) It should be fixed now.

irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Thank you for reporting this. It was an oversight. It should be fixed now.
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
I was able to fix this. You should be able to view the photos via the link now, but if anyone has trouble with it please let me know.
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
The original photos are processed for more efficient storage, so I believe that all EXIF data is stripped out, but I'll have to check to make sure.
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Claiming an album simply adds the album to your "My Account" page for easy access. It would be very hard to claim an album that wasn't yours without knowing the url which is randomly generated so it's very difficult to guess...
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
I can see how that might be confusing. I'll have to give that some thought.

You don't really get much through registration right now other than a simple way to keep track of the photo albums you've created...

irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
The cost of storage is very low, so I'm hoping that between some reasonable advertising, pro accounts, and printing services the hosting bill can be covered even with a lot of free accounts. DropBox has done this successfully, so I think it is very possible. Over time the cost of storage will continue to drop as well, making the financial equation more effective...
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Fair enough. Feature added.

There's now a link next to the "Download Photo" button called "View Original" when you click to view the larger photos.

Update

Unfortunately on Chrome this link doesn't work because the photo is stored in a way that tells Chrome to automatically download the photo. I'll have to dig in to figure out if there is a way to force the photo to be displayed instead of automatically downloaded.

irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
I don't know much about bittorrent sync. How does it work?
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
I'm not entirely sure that I care if you register. It might be beneficial, but I'm more concerned about you finding it useful and using it / sharing it with other people. If a lot of people use it anonymously I think it would be fine, although maybe that's naive...

The second line is meant to explain that after one month you can pay $0.99 and download all the full-size photos (before one month you can do that for free). Is that how you understood it?

irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
I actually debated this quite a bit and went back and forth on it. I eventually decided that I wanted to keep it as simple as possible and figured that people might have a bunch of people add photos and then they could switch it to view-only to share with other people. Or they could create a copy of the album that they can reorder and delete extraneous photos that they can share in view-only mode.

I'd certainly consider tweaking it, though, to make it possible to share a view-only and collaborative album simultaneously.

irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Good to know. That wouldn't be too hard to add.

Out of curiosity why do you want to view the full-resolution photos vs. the ones that are scaled to fit your screen?

irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
imgur is more about sharing a single photo or creating a meme. This is more about creating and sharing an album of photos. The features of SimpleNeat include things like reordering photos, custom urls for albums, easy downloading, and, eventually, easy printing or creating mugs or t-shirts.
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Yes, that is the biggest feature people have asked for. I'm trying to figure out the best way to do it.

Quick question. Would it be ok if you clicked a link and then it emailed you a bit later when the download was ready?

irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Thank you, that's a good idea.
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Yes, right now the "view-only" link becomes a collaborative album through a boolean set in the database. I'd be happy to create a separate url if you think that would make it more obvious.
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Also I should note that it works well in mobile safari. You can easily bulk upload photos from your mobile phone that way. I'll probably be making it in to a native app as well for the hell of it sometime soon.
irrationaljared··on Show HN: Dead simple photo sharing
Here's a clickable link:

http://www.simpleneat.com

irrationaljared··on Tetris Reimagined For A TouchScreen (drag pieces with your fingers)
I've always been a huge fan of Tetris and for a while now I've thought the core concept would work great on a touch screen where you could literally grab the pieces and position them appropriately.

I looked around but there weren't any attempts to make a game where you could grab a block and fit it in to the puzzle. There have been versions where you can use the touch-screen like an old GameBoy, with the controls just areas on the screen. There's even a version by EA where you click an area where it is supposed to go: http://www.ea.com/tetris-iphone/images/877085a5002f3310VgnVC... (at least I think that's how it works). But again, I couldn't find anything where you could actually grab a piece with your finger and position it in the puzzle.

The big problem, though, is that the whole increasing speed aspect of the game gets screwed up as soon as you start grabbing pieces with your finger (the piece stops falling so the speed that it is falling at matters very little).

So I decided to embrace this constraint and create a falling blocks game that doesn't require the block to fall faster in order to be challenging.

Some of the changes I made:

1) You can grab and move any piece at any time (except if they are partially off the screen). 2) You can place pieces under other pieces. 3) You can pause the game and completely reorder all of the pieces. 4) You have to fill in the bottom row completely in order to build your structure in to the sky. 5) There are a number of challenging pieces that you have to incorporate in to your structure.

With the changes, the game becomes more about the puzzle-like aspect of organizing the pieces as they are presented and less about the speed at which they are presented.

I'm guessing some Tetris fans will find some of these changes annoying or even offensive. It's just one person's attempt to make the classic "falling blocks" game work on a touch screen. I'm sure there are other ways you could approach it.

The game is available on IOS and Android for a buck. There's also a brief video at the link that shows that game in action. Sorry about charging for it, but I'm hoping to recoup some of the expenses that went in to making it and ideally help to fund my next puzzle game.

If you do end up trying it out I'd love to hear feedback if people have it. It takes a little practice to get good at grabbing and rotating pieces. I recommend making a "peace sign" with your fingers and using your index finger to grab and move pieces while swiping with your middle finder to rotate. Once you get that down, though, it's a lot of fun. Also it's a little easier on a larger screen, so if you have an iPad you may want to try it out on that to start.

irrationaljared··on Does anyone have an idea for a new level for my teach-people-to-program game?
clickable link: http://peanutty.org (works in chrome only)
irrationaljared··on [dead]
clickable link: http://peanutty.org
irrationaljared··on Ask HN: Does this website make sense?
Thanks for the feedback. I've added in a level that requires a little coding to solve :)

http://peanutty.org/#level/a_little_code

irrationaljared··on Ask HN: Does this website make sense?
Yea, exactly, that's what I was thinking. Just need to get a little more sophisticated with the levels. I have one in mind to build a tower on a see-saw, so unless you place the blocks perfectly, they'll fall over, making it way more easy if you just code it.
irrationaljared··on Ask HN: Does this website make sense?
Awesome, thanks :)
irrationaljared··on Ask HN: Does this website make sense?
Ok, cool. I'll try that. Thanks
irrationaljared··on Ask HN: Does this website make sense?
Yea, I was thinking about that. Maybe I'll do that for the next level I build.
← PreviousPage 2 of 4Next →