1,547 karma · joined June 16, 2011
Questions about whether the entire article is misleading should be addressed via discussion in the comments or, if it's egregiously wrong, flagged/downvoted/removed.
The pendulum has swung too far. This wasn't clickbait, it was a fair and accurate summary of the full piece. Flag the entire post if you think it's inherently inflammatory, downvote, ban it if you're an admin, but this title had no business being edited.
From the article:
> I will say it clearly: Watson is a fraud. I am not saying that it can’t crunch words, and there may well be value in that to some people. But the ads are fraudulent.
That's what this is about. Not "Claims made by IBM about Watson and AI."
The Will Wilson I remember was not prone to such understatement. That API (and the corresponding semantics) was a nightmare.
Although it starts by running `make`, it's about as in-house as a thing can be.
Me too.
Back on topic, I really enjoyed Zulip as well. It wasn't perfect, but it very much did feel like they were actually getting the marriage of email and chat closer to right. Slack just feels like a shitty chat client that uses all of my RAM.
At the time of the Alphabetization, there was some shuffling of the code of conduct document, but everything lives on.
The Google code of conduct[0] still begins with "Don't be evil."
The Alphabet code of conduct[1] opens with "Employees of Alphabet and its subsidiaries and controlled affiliates (“Alphabet”) should do the right thing."
And yet I repeatedly read the claim that Google has secretly abandoned "don't be evil"—presumably on the down low so that they can now do all the evil they want.
[0]: https://abc.xyz/investor/other/google-code-of-conduct.html [1]: https://abc.xyz/investor/other/code-of-conduct.html
As good as humans implies that over one million people would be killed by robots every year. Some of the families, loved ones and attorneys of these people would be able to make very convincing cases that they would not have died if a human were driving. This is a hard problem to overcome.
Possibly relevant, given your choice of fusion as an example, is the somewhat famous graph from the 1976 U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration report on nuclear fusion[0]. We're obviously looking at a number of projections and can't know whether they were right or wrong, but it is noteworthy that we're not even pursuing a plan we believe will ever lead to nuclear fusion ("fusion never").
[0]: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._historical_fusi...
This is usually only noteworthy when it fails, but by and large it works. The friction involved if we did not generally accept someone's (signed, notarized, appropriately formalized) word as bond would cause our world to grind to a halt.
"Not only is today's Numberphile video potentially relevant, Numberphile actually directly addressed the article's exact topic several months ago."
https://www.cnet.com/news/nokia-6-your-mission-is-to-get-the...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOnqjkJTMaA&t=5m0s
Curious what you mean by half the claps? Would this involve clapping only on every fourth beat, only on every second beat, or am I completely misunderstanding?
It is interesting, and there are some studies exploring this and related issues. The results are not always immediately intuitive!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113517/ is one good place to start.
You can also probably find it elsewhere if you're not a supporter of your local PBS station, but I'll leave that search up to everyone and their conscience.
[1] https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/coywolf-meet-the-coywolf/
you know Allstate isn't going to be looking for social media information that HELPS your claim.
But from the article:
As for use cases for social media during the insurance claims process, Carpe Data cited two examples. The first one was where a customer was paralyzed. A social media search helped confirm the information more quickly through pictures of the customer in a wheelchair, which ultimately led to the claim being settled and paid out faster.
It's presumably in Allstate's interest to identify fraud, but also to process claims as efficiently as possible, no?
5 hours from the east coast of the US sounds right, but Seattle to Reykjavic is over 7 and closer to 8.
[0] http://www.androidpolice.com/2017/10/26/add-track-id-history...
Anyway, my research, such as it is, took me as far as the Wikipedia article on Ecclesiastes[0], which maybe provides soft support for the claim?
The presence of Ecclesiastes in the Bible is something of a puzzle, as the common themes of the Hebrew canon—a God who reveals and redeems, who elects and cares for a chosen people—are absent from it, which suggests that Kohelet had lost his faith in his old age.
Anyway, I hope that this won't discourage people from reading the entire thing, which I thought was well written and well worth the time.