One seems written by a real human more than the other.
4,919 karma · joined September 23, 2011
Happy to chat about interests: reachj45 a.t g-m-a-i-l d.o.t c-o-m
Yet.. they say a man's worth is "not" the value they put in the bank account.
2) What's deadly about this space is that surveys can be toxic.
Too often, it's researchers looking to slowly understand things, have people open themselves up, then leave them like that, for little to no progress in 5-10 years.
That kind of system needs supply, no?
3) I have heard from some men that sometimes there can be things that only other men understand. That can be similar to women's health issues can be understood differently, or men can feel more comfortable with other men.
4) It's important for authors to try and be aware of their own unconscious biases. Much like medicine is horribly behind at understanding women's health (for example, women hearts are not the same as men's), it means the inverse can be true too, beginning with asking men.
Let it organize and work with your thoughts, as you say, how you say, as you do it.
Once that is clear, it can then better create those other artifacts.
This looked interesting, unfortunately it feels far too long for humans to spend time reading.
People might really be starting to write like LLMs, it’s why reading books is the single biggest anti-slopping protection for the human brain.
The “shape” of the article was a word generator performatively generating larger words where simpler ones would do. “That holds”
Canvas is a slightly more modern and private equity Moodle for the banal transactions of student/instruction life and not actually for learning.
It’s nice it helps instructors for sure, but it’s never really been about the students.
Students are just water boarded with a multitude of too many different tools to different tools from canvas that aren’t connected nor work together for the student experience.
Learning management systems can be for managing the learners and access to learning, but rarely about the learning or learning experience or learning outcomes.
These platforms are too often so entrenched and anchored in earning in the past that they can’t see let alone reach the present or future.
Who would think we could get satellite internet that works?
The vibe coded nature of letting LLMs write patches without understanding the impacts, could invite bandaids on top of bandaids.
Where Claude Code has supposed boundaries between deterministic and non-deterministic tasks and flags.. generally.. it's unclear how much privacy has been a part of that and what implication that could have.
Hope that clarifies.
This is an awfully leaky issue.
Introducing what ISPs do with DNS information is helpful to understand how encompassing DNS self-hosting needs to be thought about - DNS requests are important to consider the appropriate encryption for.
From the homelab side, increasingly with the automated attacks on systems, it seems wise to keep all services off the internet directly and put it behind one or more service to keep them safe. From that perspective, setting up something like Tailscale can also help mitigate this kind of issue.
Looking at the unpatched Ubuntu things in my life, and I'm pretty close to asking Claude to update things to see how quickly Alpine can get close, assuming responsiveness can stay this fast and quality.
If you've ever been hit with a "webpage isn't updating" issue when someone else can see it, often it's different DNS servers.
It's best to never use the ISP's DNS servers, regardless of the reason why they might do what they do.
Set an external DNS server on your router, or learn to run your own locally.
LLMs will find it.
They work endlessly at finding the 'and' scenarios.
This should have been closed up a long time ago.