j_maffe

Almost all of my karma is from a single post link that blew up randomly. I think this is the case for most users' karma here.

But that seems to have little to do with the quote... I'm confused.

You think they'll shutdown FB?

What does cheating benchmarks have to do with breaching financial user agreements? To use your argument: all it takes is one whistleblower to get the company sued for billions of dollars.

> If not, congrats, you're on the same intellectual level as a racist.

I remember HN comments used to be of higher quality than this.

> So I'd rather spare myself from explaining it.

Being snarky doesn't really help your position.

It's good as a community to communicate what we prefer to read. At least that way the author knows why they're getting the cold shoulder.

Such a brain-dead idea...

Visualization of the configuration: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/9db65255-16ff-4f8e-8be1-1...

Cheating how? The proof is in the pudding...

> No one is claiming that time is a random variable drawn from a normal distribution.

You are doing that implicitly by fitting a Gaussian curve.

> statistically speaking

That's a very big word you're using there for what is basically making shapes out of clouds. A bell-curve is the amortised function of a random variable with a mean and standar deviation. What does that have to do with a timeseries dataset?

I'd call it significant that the number of questions halved within one year following the release of ChatGPT, the biggest relative or absolute rate of decrease in the timeseries.

You don't just fit a Gaussian distribution to a timeseries dataset. That's not what a Gaussian curve is designed for at all. https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/1725:_Linear_Regr...

> There's no one drop where "AI got into the market"

Sure there is, number of questions halved from 100K in first of November 2022 to 50K exactly one year later.

> better models consistently renders pelican in higher quality The article literally avoid making this argument and gives counterexamples to this statement.

Yes and that would improve its ability to draw SVGs of pelicans on bikes, no?

Yeah I felt the same about the decision when they decided to move to database structure. If it had this structure from the start it could've built up an ecosystem like Obsidian's but now it's hard to justify going for it.

They announced from the start that Fable was going to be on subscription for a trial period only, no?

Didn't they announce they're stopping that system?

I think it's a worthy retort simply because it's the only other major provider.

> because whoever was responsible for that would have had paid for it in front of the American legal system or American people

That literally never happened.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haditha_massacre?wprov=sfla1

> By June 17, 2008, six defendants had their cases dropped and a seventh was found not guilty.[5] The only one of the eight charged to face punishment was Staff Sergeant Frank Wuterich. On October 3, 2007, the Article 32 hearing investigating officer recommended that charges of murder be dropped and Wuterich be tried for negligent homicide in the deaths of two women and five children.[6] Further charges of assault and manslaughter were ultimately dropped. Wuterich pled guilty to the only remaining charge, one count of negligent dereliction of duty, and was convicted on January 24, 2012.[7][8]

> was to me a shining example of progress and humanity.

Which country was the US bombing to the ground at this period you're reminiscing on?

I think the cited weight loss comes from energy efficiency gains leading to less battery capacity needed.

> Maybe the solution is not more EU, but less EU.

You haven't given a single reason why that would be beneficial.

Because Tesla hasn't been classified as a gate-keeper in the DMA.

Not sure what you mean by blackmailing but it can't be the right word here.

yes but it's also the other way around, no? _businesses pages_ bring hundreds of thousands of eyes to _facebook/instagram_ that otherwise would not see FB/IG.

it took significant research efforts to just understand how these models learn how to multiply two numbers. The fact that we know how they operate doesn't mean we understand it.