j_maffe

Idk if anyone will see these offerings more than just an added bonus, especially when you compare to OAI which asks for more for only the AI models.

It more sounds like the district attorneys won

I'm not sure who made the argument that inequality is unavoidable. The argument is that it's a strong tendency and a common scenrio without structural provisions.

It's not about validation, it's about expression and communicationw with other humans. That's one of the key beauties of art and it's being flooded away with artificial, empty content

He's mainly prominent for the his role in an archaic cult. I'm not sure what we gain with giving special interest to anyone in such roles

You're being reductive. A system should be evaluated on how its measurable properties more than anything else.

LLMs are also more than NLP. They're deep learning models.

No it's the perception of likelihood of breakthrough

I think you're wrong. I know several bright students that have decided to not go to the US now given the persecution and targeting of international students.

I'm sorry Harvard has disappointed your synicism

OAI are so ahead of the competition, they don't need to compare with the competition anymore /s

You think Rotherham and Le Pen are more corrupt than Donald trump? Also Romanian elections properly dealt with foreign intervention, unlike the US.

No because I'm not the one making absolutist statements. The burden is on the one giving the stronger claim.

You'll have to be more specific about where in Europe. Some places, yes. But only a minority

Idk Xi is much more consistent with the CCP than Trump is with anything.

Source?

I don't think anyone ould disagree with what you're saying here, especially LeCun.

There's absolutely a huge gap between user preference and model performanc that is widening by the minute. The more performant these models get, the more individual and syntactical preferences prevail.

Way to go dismissing ideologies as mere tribalism. I'm sure that's a great way to just shut off your brain.

> But ... that's not how science works

Not sure where this is coming from.

Also, it's important to keep in mind the quote "The electric light did not come from the continuous improvement of candles"

Or that, you know, most academic works tend to be much more progressive.

I hate it when people quote Hofstadter's "law" in a literal sense. It was never made to make any statement about timeline estimation. It was just an example of a recursively-defined law. Honestly I'm not even sure how many of the other quotes are also taken out of context.

would you write a response just to be read by an LLM?

This isn't an opinion or take given by a dentist, it was given by a patient.

Yes that's where the freedom of citizens comes into play.

You're refuting a statment based on studies and statistics by anecdotal evedince. Also, GP never denied that flouridation is still helpful for non-brushing residents.

What، acompany needs to cover the costs of how it was acquired, now? If it's valued at the price it was purchased and making a positive revenue stream then it is profitable.

Chatbots are not social media platforms. Also the vast majority of expected revenue from this industry is not from casual paying users, it's from other companies who will optimize for performance and price.

> I assume there are many thousands of developers like me that detest macOS

Out of millions of buyers. Developers are almost an irrelevant demography to consider for such a fundamental change.

If you're expecting a significant portion of EU citizens would take a stance with Apple instead of the EU, you'd be wrong.