266 karma · joined May 20, 2018
While a mouthpad seems slighly superior to an eye tracker, the real benefit lies in having more alternatives in my opinion. So you can use your tongue when your eyes are tired and your eyes when your tongue is tired.
For example I might have an 'embedding' object, which I put into a an 'embeddings' list, which in turn I put into a another list, as illustrated by the pseudocode:
embeddings_ = []
for X in Y:
embeddings = []
for embedding in X:
embeddings.append(embedding)
embeddings_.append(embeddings)
I wonder, what are your thoughts on naming such 'superplural' entities? In the past I have sometimes used an underscore like in the example above, or another suffix like '_list'. The paper I link to has another suggestion: 'embeddingses'. Other times we get lucky and there is actually a proper term for the 'list of lists' objects, for example, a list of lists of pixels is an image [1].[1] This analogy makes me realize that 'superplurality' might also be seen as n-dimensionality, in the sense that a pixel is 0-d, a list of pixels is 1-d, an image is 2-d and, going further, a list of images (like a video) can be interpreted as 3-d.
If NLP tasks make a similar jump in quality as DALLE-2 did when compared to DALLE then they too might disrupt the writer industry.
https://github.com/logicguy1/The-Cookbook
Seems like the ideal way to share and learn new recipes to me
The risk of a disaster is a different matter I don't want to get in to, I think people just fear what they don't understand. By this point, the people making and running the things know what they are doing in my opinion.