2,340 karma · joined July 27, 2011
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jamescun; my proof: https://keybase.io/jamescun/sigs/eg-YzEEaRcyzNwlxW6095oWVjkLanjoACl6O7WSxk0U ]
If they treat it like the last round of Xen vulnerabilities, they will simply place a warning on their dashboard an hour beforehand - not sending out any form of email notice. The first we knew about it was when we started receiving alerts from nagios.
As an aside, GoCardless open-sourced their API docs https://github.com/gocardless/api-docs .
There has been talk of incorporating this ability and slim executables go (I think it might even be in the roadmap now).
Left Right
Green Labour Conservatives UKIP
Climate Change X X X
Renewables X X
Nuclear X X X
Fossil Fuels X X
Between the two major parties (Labour and Conservatives) there is widespread support for belief in Climate Change just difference of opinions on how to tackle it.All names appear to begin with LizardNSA.
It must be said, however, that all exit and non-exit nodes go through acceptance process over 88 days
Good thing none of our adversaries have any form of co-ordination or literal armies of hackers.
However for Go's current platforms, I would call it a non-issue. Static builds, something seemingly long forgotten though supported in other compiled languages, make deployment and distribution that bit easier.
I would support static builds by default, optional dynamic builds.
The time and effort required to introduce technical preventative measures far out-weigh the "loss" from the Hackintosh community (which is still a minuscule niche in comparison to their genuine markets).
While there are people who most likely dislike systemd because they are resistant to change, they don't constitute everyone with objections. I for one dislike systemd, not because I am resistant to change, but on a purely technical basis (which I won't discuss as it has already been reiterated ad nauseam).
I must also add that I dislike sysv and like that the community is discussing alternatives; but the race to systemd, with some serious technical failings which have not been addressed, scares me.
EDIT: "reasonable policy" being no flash, no auto-play videos, no flashing banners and no javascript "pop-overs"
Ruby in Go: https://github.com/grubby/grubby
Javascript in Go: https://github.com/robertkrimen/otto
> rsync --progress <source> <destination>
> rsync --progress /home/me/music/*.mp3 /mnt/shared/music
Personally I have written to my MP several times in several different constituencies only to receive back the same cookie cutter party line on the subject and addresses none of the valid concerns I raise, I hear this same from others about their MPs.
One of the core features of CentOS/RedHat/Scientific Linux/etc is their longterm support and package freeze (excluding critical security updates). If you are reliant on a different version of software from the default repositories (both newer or older) then you are encouraged to build and package them yourself. Additionally in the RedHat-derivative universe there is the EPEL package repository which contains a wider range of software and is kept more readily updated in addition to being maintained by the Fedora Project (essentially RedHat).
That being said I attended several schools in the UK and I, and those that I know (some attending schools run by the Church of England), was never really taught about creationism or anything of religious affiliation outside of RE lessons. YMMV.
It seems to be part of the media-induced fear of creeping extremism in schools after a alleged "plot" by a small number of Islamic extremists trying to take over schools in the Birmingham area (see "Operation Trojan Horse"). I am glad however that legislation is targeting broad strokes religion in the science classroom as opposed to just targeting Islam.
Also a reminder to not link directly to hacked pages but to perhaps a screenshot and put the real link in the comments, as we don't know if there could be malicious javascript et al injected into the page.
We could have saved some money by using a cheaper European provider (iirc OVH had a similar spec'd server for £200), but we were all based in the UK so the low latency was a major benefit. The UK server provider market really needs some disruption.
Some may say you are in essence paying a third party for Mojang's work, when in fact you have already done so by purchasing the game in the first place. What position do Mojang feel they are in to dictate how people play the game?
Ultimately it comes down to what players want, players are not afraid to vote with their feet and abandon servers which operate in this way; as of yet there seems to be no widespread trend in abandoning these servers.
As an aside, I believe this is more likely a push by Mojang to shut down paid servers and move people onto their Minecraft Realms product which does exactly this.